From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Seth Falcon Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-svn: avoid respewing similar error messages for missing paths Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 03:30:37 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20070327190004.GD16591@localdomain> <20070331005448.GA6948@muzzle> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Wong X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Apr 02 12:30:50 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HYJoF-0005Uz-UN for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 12:30:48 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965397AbXDBKan (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2007 06:30:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965398AbXDBKan (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2007 06:30:43 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169]:26696 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965397AbXDBKam (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2007 06:30:42 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 44so1498625uga for ; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 03:30:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:to:cc:subject:references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=ti9z7TjEOM8UtEO3RTjFy71V+bijjCX2BLjH3OMKlzqRWXnin2fEH0d57MXsgKhtfge/YC/GDM5a1rO1R5X48BYqnNWoIPgLEs0x8wLTQviJsnEqePJd263+jWR+baHdi7z1wcieWEYshSZXYyaASQ3PAZ+9WnfhIYJsGmYqPqk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:to:cc:subject:references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=nDrc5MUYzPxoIuM19YePSGaLK3Dy745YzcXEE4XdPccJ1ODNaEA176uEiMmTXomsGdgIGtn5defOm2JFjYB4Ug0nOnkm3/9HQqUjl5UpYVIbKQgMIJ3UpJcSQ97r0Az6yhA/S3YKC1T3QQOpBEStrKskZmAVJfB9lljFCpuRvjI= Received: by 10.67.97.7 with SMTP id z7mr4366628ugl.1175509841008; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 03:30:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ziti ( [193.62.205.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 59sm6793067ugf.2007.04.02.03.30.39; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 03:30:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20070331005448.GA6948@muzzle> (Eric Wong's message of "Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:54:48 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (darwin) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi Eric, Eric Wong writes: > We ignore errors if the path we're tracking did not exist for > a particular revision range, but we still print out warnings > telling the user about that. > > As pointed out by Seth Falcon, this amounts to a lot of warnings > that could confuse and worry users. I'm not entirely comfortable > completely silencing the warnings, but showing one warning per > path that we track should be reasonable. Thanks, this is much quieter. I have the impression that the initial fetch phase is taking longer than it used to. This could easily be due to network and server load related issues, but I wonder if something in the parent following / path searching is different. The first git svn fetch seems to do nothing for a very long time (except emit a few of the warnings) and then once it starts actually adding commits it goes quite fast. This isn't really a problem as the initial fetch is a fairly rare operation, but I wondered if this made sense based on recent git-svn changes... + seth