From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix formatting in git-config(1) Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 10:51:31 +0200 Message-ID: References: <7v4nq5twwg.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7v62ainbub.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vbokala5e.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jun 23 10:52:22 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SiM4r-0007Jl-Tl for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 10:52:22 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751722Ab2FWIvk (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jun 2012 04:51:40 -0400 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:50353 "EHLO mail-out.m-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750950Ab2FWIvj (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jun 2012 04:51:39 -0400 Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (frontend1.mail.intern.m-online.net [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3WK9Nw0C81z3hhd3; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 10:51:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from linux.local (ppp-88-217-109-173.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.109.173]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3WK9P12YWgz4KK92; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 10:51:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: by linux.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 2A6431E5329; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 10:51:31 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: How's it going in those MODULAR LOVE UNITS?? In-Reply-To: <7vbokala5e.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Sat, 23 Jun 2012 01:12:13 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > So with your patch, users of AsciiDoc 8.5.2 will be harmed by the > same breakage as you get with 8.4.5 and 8.6.6 with or without your > patch, and without your patch, users of AsciiDoc 8.5.2 gets a lot > more reasonable output than with your patch? The behaviour is completely independent from the asciidoc version. All three versions produce the same output. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."