From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Schwab Subject: Re: Need to change old commit (and regenerate tree) Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 00:09:19 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Antriksh Pany X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 21 00:09:28 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFDvk-0000WG-IX for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 00:09:28 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755109Ab0ETWJX (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 18:09:23 -0400 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:34497 "EHLO mail-out.m-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754945Ab0ETWJW (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 18:09:22 -0400 Received: from mail01.m-online.net (mail.m-online.net [192.168.3.149]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429291C002BD; Fri, 21 May 2010 00:09:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.8.164]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6B690226; Fri, 21 May 2010 00:09:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.3.149]) by localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.8.164]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Np4qSJpVBfdF; Fri, 21 May 2010 00:09:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-96-104.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.96.104]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 May 2010 00:09:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 501) id 27A2ECA297; Fri, 21 May 2010 00:09:20 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: By MEER biz doo SCHOIN.. In-Reply-To: (Antriksh Pany's message of "Thu, 20 May 2010 20:17:03 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Antriksh Pany writes: > Instead of (what I initially expected): > > A--------o--------o--------o--------o(old B)--------o--------o--------o(old C) > > A2--------o--------o--------o--------B--------o--------o--------C > > > So what I am missing here? Aren't the new commits B~1, B~2, B~3 > identical to C~4, C~5, C~6 (respectively) in all ways so as to have > gotten them the same SHA1 and hence appear as what I expected them to > appear? No, they have a different commit time, which is also part of the hash. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."