From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Halasa Subject: Re: Starting to think about sha-256? Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:30:12 +0200 Message-ID: References: <44F1DCB7.6020804@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Aug 27 22:30:35 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GHRH3-0000d1-UW for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:30:30 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751123AbWH0UaQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:30:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751129AbWH0UaQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:30:16 -0400 Received: from khc.piap.pl ([195.187.100.11]:28640 "EHLO khc.piap.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751123AbWH0UaP (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:30:15 -0400 Received: by khc.piap.pl (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2E1BF10811; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:30:13 +0200 (CEST) To: Jeff Garzik In-Reply-To: <44F1DCB7.6020804@garzik.org> (Jeff Garzik's message of "Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:56:07 -0400") Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff Garzik writes: > Downsides to sha-256: > * git protocol/storage format change implications. The only which really matters, I think. > Maybe sha-256 could be considered for the next major-rev of git? Not sure, but _if_ we want it we should do it sooner rather than later. -- Krzysztof Halasa