git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com>
Cc: gitster@pobox.com, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] difftool: add support for an extended revision syntax
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:59:39 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m33acz2byv.fsf@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1237803348-9329-1-git-send-email-davvid@gmail.com>

David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com> writes:

> This adds an extended revision syntax to git-difftool.
> Users often ask "how do I compare a file against its
> previous version" and the answer is typically a combination
> of 'git log <file>' and 'git difftool <sha1> <sha1> <file>'.
> 
> This makes answering that question considerably easier.
> Users can now simply say:
> 
> 	$ git difftool <file>~
> 
> to compare <file> in the worktree against its
> previous version, and:
> 
> 	$ git difftool <file>~2 <file>~
> 
> to compare <file> from 2 versions ago to <file>'s
> previous version, etc.

Because <rev>~<n> means (see git-rev-parse(1) for example) n-th parent
in _first parent_ line, then <file>~<n> should also use first-parent
line, otherwise you invite confusion.

Also I am not sure about the syntax, as there are no restrictions on
filenames, and filenames can contain '~'.  Perhaps (proposed in this
thread) ~<n>:<file> == 
  "$(git rev-list -n <n> --first-parent HEAD -- <file> | tail):<file>"

But this might be mistaken for HEAD~<n>:<file>, which can be something
else...
 
> The extended revision syntax also expands revisions
> that are suffixed with '!' as a convenient way to
> see commit diffs.  Specifying only '!' is equivalent
> to specifying 'HEAD!'.
> 
> This makes the following statements equivalent:
> 
> 	$ git difftool !
> 	$ git difftool HEAD!
> 	$ git difftool HEAD~ HEAD

Errr... there already exists such syntax, and it is called HEAD^!
(if git-difftool can accept a..b revision specification)... or not,
as git-rev-parse(1) states:

  r1^! includes commit r1 but excludes all of its parents.

So depending on how "r1 --not r1^" and "r1 --not r1^1 r1^2" is
interpreted by diff (which accpets points, not ranges) it might be, or
might be not what you wanted by introducying '!' / <rev>:!
specification...

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
ShadeHawk on #git

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-27 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-23 10:15 [PATCH] difftool: add support for an extended revision syntax David Aguilar
2009-03-23 14:51 ` Michael J Gruber
2009-03-23 16:33   ` David Aguilar
2009-03-23 16:46     ` Michael J Gruber
2009-03-23 23:22     ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-23 23:33       ` David Aguilar
2009-03-23 23:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-27 15:59 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2009-03-27 16:28   ` David Aguilar
2009-03-27 17:21     ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-27 18:16       ` David Aguilar
2009-03-27 17:36     ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m33acz2byv.fsf@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=jnareb@gmail.com \
    --cc=davvid@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).