From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Bj?rn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>,
Geoff Russell <geoffrey.russell@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: About detached heads
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:11:33 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m34pb9xgrp.fsf@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0803141150070.3557@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Bjorn Steinbrink wrote:
>> On 2008.03.14 10:53:25 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>>
>>> So the "core git" way to do it is to literally just do
>>>
>>> git read-tree -u -m 3
>>> git commit
>>>
>>> (or use "--reset" instead of "-m" if you want to do it even in the
>>> presense unmerged entries).
>>>
>>
>> Hm, that's just squashing revert commit. Squashing can be done via:
>> git reset --soft HEAD~5 # Or wherever your squashed commit should start
>> git commit -m "Squashed from HEAD~5 onwards"
>>
>> Now the "revert" version of that:
>> git reset --hard HEAD~5 # Go back to the state that we want
>> git reset --soft ORIG_HEAD # Move HEAD back, but keep the index as is
>> git commit -m "Back at the state of HEAD~5"
>>
>> AFAICT that should have the same advantages as using read-tree, but
>> doesn't feel so low-level :-)
>
> Umm. The low-level one is a *lot* easier to understand than your
> "high-level" one, wouldn't you say?
>
> And when the low-level plumbing commands are easier, are they not then
> better porcelain?
AFAIK the porcelain equivalent to plumbing
git read-tree -u -m 3
is just
git checkout 3 -- .
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-14 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-14 9:46 About detached heads Geoff Russell
2008-03-14 9:51 ` Jonathan del Strother
2008-03-14 10:39 ` David Kågedal
2008-03-14 10:15 ` Wincent Colaiuta
2008-03-14 10:48 ` Matthieu Moy
2008-03-14 11:17 ` Wincent Colaiuta
2008-03-14 10:52 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-03-14 12:16 ` Sergei Organov
2008-03-14 12:28 ` Adam Piatyszek
2008-03-14 13:42 ` Chris Shoemaker
2008-03-14 14:53 ` Rafael Garcia-Suarez
2008-03-14 15:19 ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-03-14 15:21 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-03-14 17:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-14 18:37 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-03-14 18:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-14 19:11 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2008-03-14 19:17 ` Sean
2008-03-14 23:43 ` Geoff Russell
2008-03-15 0:03 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-03-15 0:38 ` Nicolas Pitre
2008-03-15 2:03 ` Geoff Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m34pb9xgrp.fsf@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=B.Steinbrink@gmx.de \
--cc=geoffrey.russell@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).