From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: oxcrete <oxcrete@yahoo.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: auto insert history info into source files, at commit?
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 10:04:43 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m38wzoth0l.fsf@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16562665.post@talk.nabble.com>
oxcrete <oxcrete@yahoo.com> writes:
> How do you do this with Git? I couldn't find it in the documentation. the
> standard $Log, $Revision... didn't seem to work. I'll take an RTFM answer if
> you can point me to the right section in the manual. Appologies, if this was
> posted before - couldn't find a good regex to search this topic.
http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/GitFaq#head-4a0afe71a2bb7734777a8b0b345e0308aefdbd40
"Does git have keyword expansion?" (and also next section, "Does git
allow arbitrary conversion of contents?")
Simply said keywords do not work well together with nonlinear history,
and especially with the way git is engineered, being content-adressed.
If you have the following history:
A---B---C---D---E
\
\-F---G---H
and the file 'foo' has the same contents in both branches, in both E
and H commits (revisions), it would be noticed by git and it wouldn't
touch this file when switching branches. It is one of the keys to git
performance. This is important not only for switching branches, but
also for merging.
But if they have $Revision$, or $Author$ keywords, and those would be
different, it couldn't be done this way.
Therefore git supports "keyword expansion" in three ways, beginning
from simplest.
1. The `ident` attribute, which allows to expand $Id$ to
$Id: <sha-1>$, where <sha-1> is blob (file contents) identifier.
2. The `export-subst` attribute, and/or various tricks in Makefile,
which allow embedding information about current revision (like result
of "git describe") in files when using "git archive" (atribute), or
"make" / "make dist". This is I think the preferred way; both git and
Linux use Makefile tricks to embed version info in result of
compilation.
3. Use `filter` attribute to expand keywords when checking out file,
and removing keywords when commiting changes (but watch for binary
files!). This would affect performance. I also don't think that
there is any example doing keyword expansion with `filter`
gitattribute; you can be first! ;-)
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-08 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-08 16:03 auto insert history info into source files, at commit? oxcrete
2008-04-08 17:04 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2008-04-08 19:00 ` Santi Béjar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m38wzoth0l.fsf@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oxcrete@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).