git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: david.hagood@gmail.com
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Making GIT XML aware?
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 07:25:54 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3bplulop9.fsf@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fcdc4d8bb3b1ee0b1473a48ed79e7c61.squirrel@localhost>

david.hagood@gmail.com writes:

> I have a project that is committing several XML files into GIT, and we
> have a problem when doing merges.
> 
> The files are UML XMI 1.1 files generated by a UML tool (specifically
> Enterprise Architect by Sparx), and EA "helpfully" puts things like
> timestamps of modification and access into the files. As you can guess,
> these are conflict-magnets. Yes, the ideal solution would be to turn that
> off, and I am pursuing that avenue within EA.
> 
> However, it seems to me that if there were some way to plug into GIT's
> merging logic, it would be possible to design an XML aware merging tool
> that might help on this (generalizing: if you could have content-aware
> merging libraries you could make all sorts of merges go more smoothly).
> For the specific case of an XML file, if you could have some way to denote
> tags and/or attributes that are "don't cares" you could address problems
> like I am having. You could also theoretically exploit a knowledge of the
> format to better identify what chunks are changes and possibly track
> motion within the files better.

With Git you are able to use custom merge driver for specific files
(files specified by glob, which can be all files) by using `merge`
gitattribute (it is about file-level merging in the case of file
contents conflict).  Or you can use 'merge.default' config variable to
set merge driver for all files.

Also you can set `diff` filter to custom diff driver which ignores
timestamps, or even remove timestamps from files when checking them in
using `filter` gitattribute (clean / smudge filters).

> Absent that, is there a way to tell git "in case of an unresolvable merge
> conflict, don't modify the file but put the other version of the file
> somewhere (e.g. filename.other) so that I can use an external tool to
> resolve the differences"? In this case, EA doesn't know how to use the
> standard conflict tags within a file to extract deltas.
 
You can have `merge` attribute unset , e.g 

  *.uml  -merge

This means "Take the version from the current branch as the tentative
merge result, and declare that the merge has conflicts."


Also if you have some graphical merge tool, you can consider
configuring and using git-mergetool.

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
ShadeHawk on #git

      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-09-01 14:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-01 13:57 Making GIT XML aware? david.hagood
2009-09-01 14:06 ` Avery Pennarun
2009-09-01 14:25 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3bplulop9.fsf@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=jnareb@gmail.com \
    --cc=david.hagood@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).