From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: [PATCH] transport: do not allow to push over git:// protocol Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 02:49:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <1317432415-9459-1-git-send-email-pclouds@gmail.com> <20111003074250.GB9455@sigill.intra.peff.net> <4E8975E7.2040804@viscovery.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Jeff King , =?utf-8?b?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu40=?= =?utf-8?b?YyBEdXk=?= , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Sixt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 03 11:51:20 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RAfBA-0006zX-9g for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 11:51:20 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754524Ab1JCJvQ convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2011 05:51:16 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:50746 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754074Ab1JCJvO convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2011 05:51:14 -0400 Received: by bkbzt4 with SMTP id zt4so5086164bkb.19 for ; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 02:51:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=x-authentication-warning:to:cc:subject:references:from:date :in-reply-to:message-id:lines:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rH9uAaGbAujZDYCILQT+4ONZG419fYk5WqcerqbeMVw=; b=aFt8Q08TOPiO8pk9mfUwZr57XFEgMchrDkTQ9qFTZ/OUjdE1vjF0DqshlZ3Btj+set VMUT+6P0DHDJRYX1J5FqXnQ5d+4f7P5fTlCGRHdWqB7O6oF3tkfWOnW6V6Ik6RrxIsiP LZPPplEiEZuRs1vyXOSMobzZC9A4FTAWkc1u8= Received: by 10.223.29.69 with SMTP id p5mr6915209fac.35.1317635357265; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 02:49:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (abwl123.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl. [83.8.235.123]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k26sm20571780fab.12.2011.10.03.02.49.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 03 Oct 2011 02:49:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p939mbkN014820; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 11:48:47 +0200 Received: (from jnareb@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id p939mFQw014813; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 11:48:15 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: jnareb set sender to jnareb@gmail.com using -f In-Reply-To: <4E8975E7.2040804@viscovery.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Sixt writes: > Am 10/3/2011 9:42, schrieb Jeff King: > > I still think push-over-git:// is a bit insane, and especially now = with > > smart-http, you'd be crazy to run it. And in that sense, I wouldn't= mind > > seeing it deprecated. >=20 > You must be kidding ;) It is so much easier to type >=20 > git daemon --export-all --enable=3Dreceive-pack >=20 > for a one-shot, temporary git connection compared to setting up a > smart-http, ssh, or even a rsh server. I wonder if that is the case... but 48% responders of "Git User's Survey 2011" (3424 out of 7100 responders who answered queston=20 "23) How do you publish/propagate your changes?") answered that they use push via git protocol. See https://www.survs.com/results/Q5CA9SKQ/P7DE07F0PL --=20 Jakub Nar=EAbski