From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eli Barzilay Subject: Re: git rev-list formatting Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:59:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4BA7A75A.6060909@lsrfire.ath.cx> <4BA89D88.7080803@drmicha.warpmail.net> <20100323122603.GA2053@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Mar 23 13:59:26 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nu3hc-0001oe-WF for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:59:25 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752943Ab0CWM7T (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:59:19 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:33294 "EHLO lo.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752826Ab0CWM7S (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:59:18 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nu3hV-0001mb-4L for git@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:59:17 +0100 Received: from winooski.ccs.neu.edu ([129.10.115.117]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:59:17 +0100 Received: from eli by winooski.ccs.neu.edu with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:59:17 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: winooski.ccs.neu.edu User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:eQPnbiPL/YYS1O7fhEFNR7gzk/k= Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 07:06:38AM -0400, Eli Barzilay wrote: > >> > [...] >> >> I've made a copy of the repository at >> >> http://tmp.barzilay.org/testing.git.tgz >> >> which shows what I said when I run >> >> git rev-list --pretty="%b" 267d60518 >> git rev-list --pretty="%b" 84482 > > The problem is that most of those commits don't _have_ bodies. > Remember that "%b" is about everything in the commit message after > the first first paragraph. *Ugh*... Yes, I've seen that a lot, yet somehow I managed to completely miss it. Sorry about the noise. > Now one might argue that rev-list should still put in the extra > newline separator in this case. I haven't been paying attention, but > hasn't that been discussed in another thread recently? (That might have made it more confusing, but I should still have guessed what's wrong...) -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!