From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "J.H." <warthog9@kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: Issue with gitweb + tag + branch of the same name from master branch commit
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:49:23 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3fxbkn5ot.fsf@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1250811031.26147.42.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org>
"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org> writes:
> I have recently been trying to make a tag and branch of the same name
But why? Why do you want to confuse git and yourself?
> from a previous <COMMIT> on a master branch on a kernel.org tree using
> the following commands:
>
> # Create the tag:
> git tag -a lio-x.y <COMMIT>
> # Push the tags:
> git push --tags origin
> # Fetch to be sure
> git fetch origin
> # Make tagged branch:
> git checkout -b lio-x.y <COMMIT>
> # Make <NEW_COMMIT> to lio-x.y and commit
> git commit frob
> # Switch back to master branch
> git checkout master
> # Push local branch to origin
> git push origin refs/heads/lio-x.y
>
> At this point after pushing to origin, I can do a fresh clone of the
> tree, and do a 'git checkout origin/lio-x.y and I see '<NEW_COMMIT>',
> and the logs and blobs look as expected..
>
> However, after checking gitweb log for branch lio-x.y on kernel.org, I
> only see <COMMIT>, and not <NEW_COMMIT>, and all of the blobs in branch
> lio-x.y still reference the original <COMMIT>, et al.
I guess that you meant here gitweb's 'log' / 'shortlog' view linked
from 'heads' view, don't you?
> John Hawley has been helping to resolve the issue (I am just going to
> use different tag/branch names instead), and hpa asked me to report this
> as it is easy to reproduce with the gitweb version on kernel.org..
> 22:42 < warthog9> I would got show this to the git people, it *could*
> just be an old bug in gitweb (ours is not particularly
> up to date) but if I can replicate it here easily enough
> I'm guessing there's still a bug elsewhere
This is an old and long fixed (or rather worked around) issue in
gitweb, fixed in bf901f8 (gitweb: disambiguate heads and tags withs
the same name, 2007-12-15)... well if by fixed you can consider
passing around "fully qualified" refnames, i.e. the 'shortlog' link in
'heads' view now uses 'refs/heads/frob', and not only 'frob'.
J.H., you might want to consider cherry-picking this... unless you
have done that, or independently fixed this issue.
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-21 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-20 23:30 Issue with gitweb + tag + branch of the same name from master branch commit Nicholas A. Bellinger
2009-08-21 0:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-08-21 22:49 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2009-08-22 20:12 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3fxbkn5ot.fsf@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=warthog9@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).