From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2008, #04; Mon, 29) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:15:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <7vocyt1is2.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Dec 31 00:17:10 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LHnpl-0004oz-J3 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:17:10 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752497AbYL3XPs (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:15:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752378AbYL3XPr (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:15:47 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f17.google.com ([209.85.219.17]:36783 "EHLO mail-ew0-f17.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750811AbYL3XPq (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:15:46 -0500 Received: by ewy10 with SMTP id 10so5748323ewy.13 for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:15:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:received :x-authentication-warning:to:cc:subject:references:from:in-reply-to :message-id:lines:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:date; bh=ApJP9MMuwLmqvNHGgd/i6ojKUzxYhwhQMBjQP7+8wOY=; b=h+qU/R7JqZt/AfsGaxHS6P4x7rxqJBq46m5Z0+v2usy8YKplRQOjpPs2oBWW/hKyvX DGuGCfeEqu3yFSFJT8fmYKNXn2gnfIIJrwyzVjVIoj60svzGcMcyDa+me/jNeaPN4V5a M6iUkUiRuGyf7vzFFr+oj67qUqqizzEfl94vI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=x-authentication-warning:to:cc:subject:references:from:in-reply-to :message-id:lines:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:date; b=KoOk5I44RdXLrkIDOL+xi3yLpKgsy0UrCFYJYzY4aL2rsxHQ4W6E2BT+9f+cTD6Kkz oK2Y+e3zj4YVVy43clFxNE+cuDug+BRgU69GDcNU0wDeuw/kQNlZ61/xf20RIqfCzOeM x6Q0rMu+rvX92bbAgdr0eW/WByU8QNtq5aqW0= Received: by 10.210.22.16 with SMTP id 16mr4170745ebv.68.1230678944565; Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:15:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (abwv44.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.8.245.44]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c22sm39105898ika.20.2008.12.30.15.15.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:15:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id mBUNHGpA028583; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:17:16 +0100 Received: (from jnareb@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id mBUNHDbH028580; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:17:13 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: jnareb set sender to jnareb@gmail.com using -f In-Reply-To: <7vocyt1is2.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > with '-' are only in 'pu' while commits prefixed with '+' are > in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of the branches, > but I am still holding onto them. > > The topics list the commits in reverse chronological order. The topics > meant to be merged to the maintenance series have "maint-" in their names. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > [Actively cooking] > > * mk/gitweb-feature (Mon Dec 15 22:16:19 2008 -0800) 1 commit > - gitweb: unify boolean feature subroutines Nice thing from what I remember (I assume it is last incantation?). > * jn/gitweb-blame (Thu Dec 11 01:33:29 2008 +0100) 3 commits > - gitweb: cache $parent_commit info in git_blame() > - gitweb: A bit of code cleanup in git_blame() > - gitweb: Move 'lineno' id from link to row element in git_blame > > Jakub seemed to feel they are not yet ready. This is, I think, ready. It is incremental AJAX-y blame in gitweb that is not yet ready; this is simple cleanup and performance improvement. > * sc/gitweb-category (Fri Dec 12 00:45:12 2008 +0100) 3 commits > - gitweb: Optional grouping of projects by category > - gitweb: Split git_project_list_body in two functions > - gitweb: Modularized git_get_project_description to be more generic I think this needs a bit more cooking; with one more commit I think you can have categories within requested sort order, and not always sorted alphabetically. > * gb/gitweb-patch (Thu Dec 18 08:13:19 2008 +0100) 4 commits > - gitweb: link to patch(es) view in commit(diff) and (short)log view > - gitweb: add patches view > - gitweb: change call pattern for git_commitdiff > - gitweb: add patch view I think it is ready, or almost ready. I'll try to review this series within a week. Feel free to prod me if I forget. P.S. BTW. what is the status on using parse_options among git commands? -- Jakub Narebski Poland ShadeHawk on #git