* git-* in hook scripts
@ 2010-02-23 16:33 Eli Barzilay
2010-02-23 23:59 ` Miklos Vajna
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eli Barzilay @ 2010-02-23 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
There are several sample hook scripts that use `git-*' -- should these
use `git *' instead?
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: git-* in hook scripts
2010-02-23 16:33 git-* in hook scripts Eli Barzilay
@ 2010-02-23 23:59 ` Miklos Vajna
2010-02-24 0:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-02-25 7:15 ` Eli Barzilay
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Miklos Vajna @ 2010-02-23 23:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Barzilay; +Cc: git
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 265 bytes --]
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:33:36AM -0500, Eli Barzilay <eli@barzilay.org> wrote:
> There are several sample hook scripts that use `git-*' -- should these
> use `git *' instead?
No need to do so, `git --exec-path` is already in PATH when those
scripts are invoked.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: git-* in hook scripts
2010-02-23 23:59 ` Miklos Vajna
@ 2010-02-24 0:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-02-25 7:15 ` Eli Barzilay
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2010-02-24 0:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miklos Vajna; +Cc: Eli Barzilay, git
Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:33:36AM -0500, Eli Barzilay <eli@barzilay.org> wrote:
>> There are several sample hook scripts that use `git-*' -- should these
>> use `git *' instead?
>
> No need to do so, `git --exec-path` is already in PATH when those
> scripts are invoked.
We have been waiting until nobody remembers days we had dashes. It may be
a good time to at least start thinking about updating them. v1.6.0 is one
year and half old.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: git-* in hook scripts
2010-02-23 23:59 ` Miklos Vajna
2010-02-24 0:32 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2010-02-25 7:15 ` Eli Barzilay
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eli Barzilay @ 2010-02-25 7:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:33:36AM -0500, Eli Barzilay <eli@barzilay.org> wrote:
>> There are several sample hook scripts that use `git-*' -- should
>> these use `git *' instead?
>
> No need to do so, `git --exec-path` is already in PATH when those
> scripts are invoked.
To make this a little more concrete, I was thinking about the fact
that `git cmd' can be different from `git-cmd' if I add a file with
the second name for one of the builtin commands.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-02-25 7:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-02-23 16:33 git-* in hook scripts Eli Barzilay
2010-02-23 23:59 ` Miklos Vajna
2010-02-24 0:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-02-25 7:15 ` Eli Barzilay
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).