From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: John Tapsell <johnflux@gmail.com>
Cc: Finn Arne Gangstad <finnag@pvv.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>,
markus.heidelberg@web.de, git@vger.kernel.org,
Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] git push: Push nothing if no refspecs are given or configured
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 07:27:35 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3mybyisa1.fsf@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43d8ce650903060426y776474fi10acc5495b88fa7@mail.gmail.com>
John Tapsell <johnflux@gmail.com> writes:
> 2009/3/6 Finn Arne Gangstad <finnag@pvv.org>:
>> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 02:32:53AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 23:25, Markus Heidelberg
>>>>> <markus.heidelberg@web.de> wrote:
>>>>>> Oh, I confused "config option" with "command line argument"...
>>>>>
>>>>> Right, I'd like to be able to do:
>>>>> $ git config push.iamnotretarded true
>>>>> $ git push
>>>>
>>>> LOL! Sverre, you have a way to crack me up...
>>>
>>> I found it amusing, too.
>>>
>>> It may have some correlation with how well organized your work habit is,
>>> but I do not think it has much correlation with being retarded. It is
>>> more about "'matching refs' is the perfect default for _my_ use pattern,
>>> don't mess with it, please".
>>
>> So here is my current WIP suggestion for a new "push.default"
>> variable, I am not sure if a single entry can express all useful
>> choices, or if it is a good idea to introduce more default choices
>> other than "nothing" (with the goal of making it the default in a
>> later release).
>>
>> I think all the values here make sense as a --option to git push
>> though (except --nothing...)
>>
>> Suggested new entry in config.txt:
>>
>> push.default::
>> Defines the action git push should take if no refspec is given
>> on the command line, no refspec is configured in the branch, and
>> no refspec is implied by any of the options given on the command
>> line.
>> +
>> The term `current remote` means the remote configured for the current
>> branch, or `origin` if no remote is set. `origin` is also used if
>> you are not on a branch at all.
>> +
>> * `nothing` do not push anything
>> * `matching` push all matching branches to the current remote.
>> All branches having the same name in both ends are considered to be
>> matching. This is the default value.
>> * `same-remote` push all matching branches that are configured to use
>> the current remote. Branches with no remote configuration are not pushed.
>> * `tracked` push all branches that are tracking a branch on the current
>> remote to their counterpart.
>
> How about 'current', to simply push the current the branch. It could
> even prompt if it's not tracked yet.
Note that if you have configuration for <remote>, you can simply add
"remote.<remote>.push = HEAD" for pushing current branch only, and
"remote.<remote>.push = :" for current matching behavior. Perhaps
"remote.<remote>.push = " works for push nothing?
> Most (all?) other revision control systems have this 'current'
> behaviour by default.
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-06 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-05 22:15 [RFC PATCH] git push: Push nothing if no refspecs are given or configured Finn Arne Gangstad
2009-03-05 22:18 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-03-05 22:22 ` Markus Heidelberg
2009-03-05 22:25 ` Markus Heidelberg
2009-03-05 22:26 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-03-06 10:24 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-03-06 10:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-06 11:17 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2009-03-06 11:48 ` Finn Arne Gangstad
2009-03-06 12:07 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-03-06 13:58 ` Finn Arne Gangstad
2009-03-06 15:25 ` Jakub Narebski
2009-03-06 17:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-07 2:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-03-06 23:00 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-03-06 12:26 ` John Tapsell
2009-03-06 15:27 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2009-03-05 22:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-03-06 10:37 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-03-09 20:39 ` Markus Heidelberg
2009-03-09 20:48 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-03-09 21:10 ` Markus Heidelberg
2009-03-09 21:10 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3mybyisa1.fsf@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=ae@op5.se \
--cc=finnag@pvv.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=johnflux@gmail.com \
--cc=markus.heidelberg@web.de \
--cc=srabbelier@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).