Re: git rev-list formatting

[Eli Barzilay <eli@barzilay.org>]

Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes:

> Eli Barzilay venit, vidit, dixit 23.03.2010 02:57:
>> René Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> writes:
>> 
>>> Am 22.03.2010 12:30, schrieb Eli Barzilay:
>>>> Possible bug -- IIUC, this:
>>>>
>>>>   git rev-list --pretty="%w(40,2,2)%b" $rev
>>>>
>>>> should show all bodies wrapped as specified, but with 1.7.0.3 I see
>>>> only the first one wrapped, and the rest don't show up.  In one of my
>>>> attempts to sort this, I saw all bodies, but all bodies after the
>>>> first were not wrapped as specified.
>>>
>>> I can't reproduce this when running this command against git's own
>>> repo.  Or perhaps I just fail to see it.  Is the one you're trying
>>> this on public?  Does it work as expected with some other version of
>>> git?
>> 
>> Sorry, I've lost track of all the different things I tried, but here's
>> something that I can reproduce reliably now, which seems to be a
>> similar problem (or at least nothing in the man page explain why it
>> would do what it does).  If this is helpful, I'll tar up the
>> repository and put it up somewhere.  This is all running in the repo
>> -- and it case it matters, it's a bare repo, created with 1.7.0.
>
> I'd say that certainly matters (can't reproduce this one on non-bare
> either).
>
> When you say "in the repo", do you mean that you're current
> directory is within yourbarerepo.git?

Yes.


> Do you have GIT_DIR set explicitly?

No.


> [...]

I've made a copy of the repository at

  http://tmp.barzilay.org/testing.git.tgz

which shows what I said when I run

  git rev-list --pretty="%b" 267d60518
  git rev-list --pretty="%b" 84482

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!