From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: Google Summer of Code 2009 Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:33:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <20090107183033.GB10790@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Shawn O. Pearce" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 10 20:35:38 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LLjcP-00076U-Aw for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:35:37 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751347AbZAJTdL (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:33:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751136AbZAJTdJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:33:09 -0500 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.186]:53605 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751081AbZAJTdI (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:33:08 -0500 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d3so1243505nfc.21 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:33:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:received :x-authentication-warning:to:cc:subject:references:from:in-reply-to :message-id:lines:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:date; bh=ikUF+o21HepR6TR8N+tTrvDcVN1YBaK9Ow5pfYUfrtA=; b=DrA6Q9jVUGGIwldCvodjteFLtBGoU6T0w2i1Ad+Diq07U+b7cB2Sc65EAx2WmcOl7U C3ULbHuC99vaVPxF3qFBW5ytTB7rc+0llzYK3nxG4dCZAulssUlzkOXq25/KiIyCGcTC MZmFo7AjnsyPpx93con63myUcHotDzncvtXR0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=x-authentication-warning:to:cc:subject:references:from:in-reply-to :message-id:lines:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:date; b=afCwVVBpgN+RowyD8bqnR+MfaZNbC2lY97dOgzpJzB3K3SozhV0cTDGrmubYgYNCyF 2Tuz7K2MXHIANvi+KibThFMN00D4ZZjPiDB1d9LyErft2v0udQpRf7EAiLh5umAHj7mp ksHA43ptUQSi4sU9Ryws8FM8ONGh+6kJFbi/I= Received: by 10.210.90.10 with SMTP id n10mr6227111ebb.150.1231615985835; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:33:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (abve97.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.8.202.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm2162169eyz.49.2009.01.10.11.33.03 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:33:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n0AJWe4s002940; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:32:45 +0100 Received: (from jnareb@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id n0AJWNDZ002934; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:32:23 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: jnareb set sender to jnareb@gmail.com using -f In-Reply-To: <20090107183033.GB10790@spearce.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Shawn O. Pearce" writes: > The application answers really need to be reworked; we need to > address our 2008 results in these parts. By the way, do you know what happened with git-sequencer project? If I remember correctly there was agreement on sequences mini-language (I think), and there was git-sequencer prototype in shell, using git-cherry-pick if I remember correctly, and even git-rebase and git-am etc reworked to make use of git-sequencer. Stephan Beyer wrote that he has some preliminary version of builtin git-sequencer (in C), and that it makes git-rebase--interactive and like faster than current implementation... but builtin sequencer never materialized on git mailing list as a patch, if I remember correctly, and of course it was not merged into git either. > The ideas box is once again open for suggestions. Please start > proposing student projects, and possible mentors. Hmm... take a look what features competition has (Darcs, Bazaar-NG, Subversion, Mercurial, Monotone)... > > > Since the program is smaller, there is a chance we won't be accepted > this year due to space constraints. But I think its still worthwhile > to prepare everything and hope for the best. And before you can > ask, no, my employee status with OSPO doesn't improve our odds > for acceptance. :-) Perhaps at least _one_ project. I think that resumable clone / resumable fetch would be a good thing to have... -- Jakub Narebski Poland ShadeHawk on #git