From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rebase: learn --discard subcommand
Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 06:41:44 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3r57hy68n.fsf@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1105290850340.28815@debian>
Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> writes:
> Maybe the recent patch [1] about adding information to git status
> about any ongoing operation would help. I'm not sure, but I think I
> would personally be a bit hesitant to cancel the current sequence
> operation without first checking what it was. OTOH, if I don't even
> remember starting a rebase operation, maybe knowing whether it was a
> rebase or an am operation might not help much. But if the message from
> git status would actually say something like "rebase in progress:
> [2/3] War on nbsp: a bit of retreat", then that might help more in
> making a decision to cancel or not.
>
> [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/172919
Such information could be not enough. I understand that "git status"
output space is limited, but it would be nice if e.g. "git status -v"
described current state in more detail:
rebase in progress: [2/3] War on nbsp: a bit of retreat"
rebasing xx/foo --onto master~5
It would describe which branch were we rebasing, and on what commit
(preferring for name-rev description to start from branch we were
rebasing onto, if possible).
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-29 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-28 2:58 [PATCH] rebase: learn --discard subcommand Martin von Zweigbergk
2011-05-28 13:15 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-05-29 12:50 ` Martin von Zweigbergk
2011-05-28 18:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-05-28 20:26 ` Tim Mazid
2011-05-28 22:50 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-05-29 13:14 ` Martin von Zweigbergk
2011-05-29 13:41 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2011-05-30 4:50 ` Michael Haggerty
2011-05-28 23:08 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-05-29 9:30 ` Tim Mazid
2011-05-29 17:28 ` Martin von Zweigbergk
2011-05-29 18:58 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-05-30 4:46 ` Michael Haggerty
2011-05-30 5:14 ` Tim Mazid
2011-05-30 8:44 ` Michael Haggerty
2011-05-30 5:01 ` Miles Bader
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3r57hy68n.fsf@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).