git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: Tor Arntsen <tor@spacetec.no>
Cc: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>,
	Hilco Wijbenga <hilco.wijbenga@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>,
	George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>,
	Eugene Sajine <euguess@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [1.8.0] reorganize the mess that the source tree has become
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 02:49:32 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3r5bo848w.fsf@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinQ13b9c1=SmMSC5ThjXcsSuMO2irwW04E+K=xY@mail.gmail.com>

Tor Arntsen <tor@spacetec.no> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 03:06, Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> wrote:
> > Hilco Wijbenga <hilco.wijbenga@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>> Quite frankly, I'm surprised there are (presumably experienced)
>>> developers who do not immediately see the value of a little
>>> organization. Surely, given the use of code conventions, formatting
>>> rules, etcetera, the obvious one step further is to also organize
>>> where the files go?
>>
>> I think one of the problems is that what's been suggested seems like
>> window-dressing.  Moving everything into src/ and calling it "organized"
>> doesn't actually accomplish much other than perhaps making the README
>> file more visible to newbs; things are _still_ a mess, just a mess with
>> four more letters...
> 
> What Miles says is my feeling as well. And having a 'bin/' as was suggested
> in one post doesn't make much sense to me either - if you want your compiled
> output to go elsewhere than the source directory then the normal way of doing
> that is to do and out-of-tree build (so if that's not working - I have
> not checked - then that's something which would be worth looking into.)

It is about supporting 'srcdir', isn't it?

BTW. what about using 'lib/' directory?
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
ShadeHawk on #git

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-04 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-02  2:29 [1.8.0] reorganize the mess that the source tree has become George Spelvin
2011-02-02  8:31 ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-02-02 20:01   ` Pascal Obry
2011-02-03  6:16 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-03  8:09   ` Miles Bader
2011-02-03 18:01   ` Andreas Schwab
2011-02-03 18:46   ` Eugene Sajine
2011-02-03 21:42     ` Hilco Wijbenga
2011-02-04  2:06       ` Miles Bader
2011-02-04  8:30         ` Tor Arntsen
2011-02-04 10:49           ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2011-02-04 11:17         ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-02-04 18:15         ` [1.8.0] " Nicolas Sebrecht
2011-02-04 22:47           ` Drew Northup
2011-02-05 15:11             ` Nicolas Sebrecht
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-31  5:53 What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2011, #06; Sun, 30) Junio C Hamano
2011-01-31 17:05 ` Planning for 1.7.5 and 1.8.0 Junio C Hamano
2011-01-31 20:28   ` [1.8.0] reorganize the mess that the source tree has become Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-31 20:57     ` Junio C Hamano
2011-01-31 21:08       ` Matthieu Moy
2011-01-31 21:33         ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-31 21:19       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-31 21:00     ` Jeff King
2011-01-31 21:28       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-31 22:17         ` Junio C Hamano
2011-01-31 22:36           ` João P. Sampaio
2011-01-31 22:37           ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-31 23:12         ` Jeff King
2011-02-01  0:29           ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-01  1:48             ` Jeff King
2011-02-01  4:05               ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-01 12:42                 ` Thomas Rast
2011-02-01 11:14                   ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-02-01 11:22                     ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-02-01 13:08                   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-01 16:02                   ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-02-01 21:53               ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-01  0:35           ` Erik Faye-Lund
2011-02-01  1:53             ` Jeff King
2011-02-01  1:00           ` Sverre Rabbelier
2011-02-01  1:57             ` Jeff King
2011-02-01  7:24           ` Jay Soffian
2011-02-01 14:42         ` Andreas Ericsson
2011-02-05  3:21     ` Martin von Zweigbergk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3r5bo848w.fsf@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=jnareb@gmail.com \
    --cc=euguess@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hilco.wijbenga@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux@horizon.com \
    --cc=miles@gnu.org \
    --cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
    --cc=tor@spacetec.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).