From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (May 2011, #02; Wed, 4) Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 02:08:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <7vsjstc1pp.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 05 11:08:42 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QHuY5-0001RZ-Oj for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 05 May 2011 11:08:42 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753344Ab1EEJIg (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 May 2011 05:08:36 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:42010 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752155Ab1EEJIf (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 May 2011 05:08:35 -0400 Received: by bwz15 with SMTP id 15so1653422bwz.19 for ; Thu, 05 May 2011 02:08:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:x-authentication-warning:to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:lines:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=WzaVJJ+blip/D2ZOL44cM+Z/iBAVPCa3aoZwCpPraxo=; b=ZpXYUjm9UGHuxiV9mEb53ZDraAixBFMUW8gRU1jRbo0VfKR+9A7hUTeJOD8YQWKsOL 9vb6t3vp2QZPWLms8tGG4KBG//WuxqxnnykigoI4kktaJVB+FQPtTl5DM3vv3rqRyiIb vqa+FzpdpcAQj66yT6yycmupPuxHjIemrgkBk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=x-authentication-warning:to:cc:subject:references:from:date :in-reply-to:message-id:lines:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=m+ubtQB6Pnt+zQndWUF0RVafrctj5jEhdqoPXEInrnqRP9du/T6Sqdg26Rmso5GW0+ sTyAtZBojlSKhTW/drU1ha9EfyRbFJA4jkVBp8/NXUVnP6FXRG8kWGJ8hTwfqHpAeh8C 8g+vpGQjYuJ/ZHtyQyRIMknxh/V0gv4KWZAug= Received: by 10.204.19.5 with SMTP id y5mr606202bka.194.1304586513908; Thu, 05 May 2011 02:08:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (abwg161.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.8.230.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q24sm1249105bks.9.2011.05.05.02.08.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 05 May 2011 02:08:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p4597vl6004779; Thu, 5 May 2011 11:08:08 +0200 Received: (from jnareb@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id p4597f9D004775; Thu, 5 May 2011 11:07:41 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: jnareb set sender to jnareb@gmail.com using -f In-Reply-To: <7vsjstc1pp.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > -------------------------------------------------- > [Stalled] > > * jn/gitweb-js (2011-04-28) 13 commits > - gitweb: Make JavaScript ability to adjust timezones configurable > - gitweb.js: Add UI for selecting common timezone to display dates > - gitweb: JavaScript ability to adjust time based on timezone > - gitweb: Unify the way long timestamp is displayed > - gitweb: Refactor generating of long dates into format_timestamp_html > - gitweb.js: Provide getElementsByClassName method (if it not exists) > - gitweb.js: Introduce code to handle cookies from JavaScript > - gitweb.js: Extract and improve datetime handling > - gitweb.js: Provide default values for padding in padLeftStr and padLeft > - gitweb.js: Update and improve comments in JavaScript files > - gitweb: Split JavaScript for maintability, combining on build > - Remove gitweb/gitweb.cgi and other legacy targets from main Makefile > - git-instaweb: Simplify build dependency on gitweb > > Rerolled. Waiting for comments. Should I extract first two commits i.e. - Remove gitweb/gitweb.cgi and other legacy targets from main Makefile - git-instaweb: Simplify build dependency on gitweb into a separate patch series? Even though their existence was triggered by further patches in series, or to be more exact - gitweb: Split JavaScript for maintability, combining on build I think this cleanup is worthy on its own. > * jn/ctags (2011-04-29) 6 commits > - gitweb: Optional grouping of projects by category > - gitweb: Modularized git_get_project_description to be more generic > - gitweb: Split git_project_list_body in two functions > - gitweb: Mark matched 'ctag' / contents tag (?by_tag=foo) > - gitweb: Change the way "content tags" ('ctags') are handled > - gitweb: Restructure projects list generation > > Waiting for comments. Should I do and post benchmarks for - gitweb: Restructure projects list generation change (when 'forks' feature is used)? Note that "gitweb: Mark matched 'ctag' / contents tag (?by_tag=foo)" has ACK from Petr Baudis ('pasky'). I think http://repo.or.cz is main or even only user of content tags. -- Jakub Narebski Poland ShadeHawk on #git