From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: Mike Gant <mwgant@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: git clone operation
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 12:23:57 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3wsifsawl.fsf@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080817184443.GA11782@mg1.gantsfort.com>
Mike Gant <mwgant@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm trying to understand git-clone and what to expect when I clone a
> repository. Disclaimer, I am a newbie :).
[...]
> According to the man page, git-clone "creates and checks out an initial
> branch equal to the cloned repository's currently active branch."
[...]
> Now, let's say that I am working in the cpu-intfc branch of the original
> repository and I clone the repository.
>
> Running git-branch -a returns the following
>
> origin/HEAD
> origin/cpu-intfc
> origin/gige_mux
> origin/improve-build
> origin/main-devel
> origin/master
> * cpu-intfc
>
> And this,
>
> $ cat .git/refs/remotes/origin/HEAD
> ref: refs/remotes/origin/cpu-intfc
>
> I was expecting to have a local branch named master (that is equal to
> the remote branch origin/cpu-intfc) instead of cpu-intfc. Am I wrong to
> expect this? Also, as a newbie user, it seems odd that I cannot specify
> which branch of repo that I am cloning should be the default (master)
> branch of the cloned repo? To put it another way, when cloning a repo I
> have no way of controlling which branch I get as the default. It just
> happens to depend on which branch the developer is working in at the
> time I clone. I've read through the man-page and there doesn't seem to
> be any way around this.
Currently the situation is a bit strange, because while git-remote
supports selecting which branch is meant to be remote-tracking master
branch via '-m <master>' option to "add" subcommand (setting
origin/HEAD symref), git-clone which is init + remote + fetch + some
bookkeeping and shortcuts doesn't.
Both commands are now built-in.
> I realize that I can create a new local branch that is based off the
> desired branch:
>
> $ git-checkout -b master origin/master
>
> Is this the accepted method for obtaining the desired branch?
You can use (with new anough Git)
$ git checkout --track -b master origin/master
to setup repository in such way that "git pull" on 'master'
would know that it is meant to fetch from 'origin' and merge
'origin/master'.
In upcoming 1.6.1 it would be enough to use
$ git checkout --track origin/master
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-17 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-17 18:44 git clone operation Mike Gant
2008-08-17 19:23 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2008-08-17 19:38 ` Björn Steinbrink
2008-08-20 2:23 ` Mike Gant
2008-08-20 2:27 ` Mike Gant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3wsifsawl.fsf@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mwgant@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).