From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Subject: Re: organizing multiple repositories with dependencies Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:25:04 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1334568432.53977.YahooMailNeo@web65906.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> <201204171837.q3HIbbcW013784@no.baka.org> <4F8EB157.5060707@web.de> <201204241759.q3OHxSbH017287@no.baka.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Jens Lehmann , Hilco Wijbenga , Git Users , Junio C Hamano , To: Seth Robertson X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 25 01:25:26 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SMp6s-0001uq-FR for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 01:25:26 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755724Ab2DXXZW (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:25:22 -0400 Received: from exprod6og105.obsmtp.com ([64.18.1.189]:46730 "EHLO exprod6og105.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754172Ab2DXXZV (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 19:25:21 -0400 Received: from CFWEX01.americas.cray.com ([136.162.34.11]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob105.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT5c2Vsp5g+eziRl1+LXO5f2y8mU8c/00@postini.com; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:25:21 PDT Received: from transit.us.cray.com (172.31.17.53) by CFWEX01.americas.cray.com (172.30.88.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:25:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <201204241759.q3OHxSbH017287@no.baka.org> (Seth Robertson's message of "Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:59:28 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Seth Robertson writes: > I have a document I created for gitslave which I have cleaned up a bit > and might be the start of such comparison. I'll look through this is more detail and I think some of the text can be combined with other contributions. I just asked Jens if he wants to create a topic branch on which we may collaborate. My inclination is to limit the documentation to what's in the upstream repository, which would eliminate repo, mr and unfortunately, for the time being, git slave, but that's just one opinion and it's a newbie opinion at that. :) Please don't take it as knocking git-slave because I think it's really cool. I would like to see it go upstream! -Dave