From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE08201A8 for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2017 22:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751630AbdBSWOH (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Feb 2017 17:14:07 -0500 Received: from [195.159.176.226] ([195.159.176.226]:35946 "EHLO blaine.gmane.org" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751307AbdBSWOH (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Feb 2017 17:14:07 -0500 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cfZjx-0004gn-Ov for git@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2017 23:13:57 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org From: Damien Regad Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-check-ref-format: fix typo in man page Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 23:13:56 +0100 Message-ID: References: <2116CBFFB78A482D8FA176BC680B3B9C@PhilipOakley> <20170219022756.pwxhjluxizuedf46@sigill.intra.peff.net> <8147218721BE4F239D00CBFAFD9B495D@PhilipOakley> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 In-Reply-To: <8147218721BE4F239D00CBFAFD9B495D@PhilipOakley> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Thanks all for the feedback. On 2017-02-19 21:40, Philip Oakley wrote: > For those not familiar with 'iff', then a change to the doc is worthwhile. Exactly. Not being a native English speaker, I had never seen 'iff' used before. Now that you guys have pointed me to its meaning I guess it makes sense in this context. That being said, IMHO software documentation is not a mathematics textbook, and should be written in "plain" English, so On 2017-02-19 03:27, Jeff King wrote: > So maybe an overall improvement would be something like: > > If the normalized refname is valid then print it to standard output > and exit with a status of 0. Otherwise, exit with a non-zero status. I'll submit a revised patch shortly, following your suggestion. Cheers Damien