From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Tilo Schwarz" Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] tig-0.14 Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:55:59 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20090205204436.GA6072@diku.dk> <2c6b72b30902121424o5d4ac0d7u67a7afb3b861aa19@mail.gmail.com> <2c6b72b30902151547q5bf183f2q1e846f261825671c@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Jonas Fonseca" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 16 22:58:10 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LZBTc-0004DS-2z for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:58:08 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751006AbZBPV4H (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:56:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750744AbZBPV4F (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:56:05 -0500 Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de ([81.169.146.160]:10668 "EHLO mo-p00-ob.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752974AbZBPV4E (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:56:04 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1234821360; l=965; s=domk; d=tilo-schwarz.de; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Cc:From:Subject:To:Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH: DomainKey-Signature; bh=o5GhPFSiSgmmb1WYDkIkhJJrJBhIiXyvHBBI/hAbSFI=; b=E6irCTpJAN5vxXa2vM22xvPGRm8ZJ9TJolhGW4XbUMbwmau2hDM445hsX9K8UKy6w1m ip1KVFXgKdrK+s09SBVSY/1+dxn+V4c6uX9Ynrek4XfrVnPE/ZsFn9zKYoYOHsUQVrENB FDa2STsd327CWisjbAoJVlufDipkpzUsZrk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; s=domk; d=tilo-schwarz.de; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-RZG-AUTH:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:Date:To:Subject:From:Cc:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To; b=TzjfuL2C/Cd8TyYWCDSYqMkDxrQMaqRahNjbnAPh5+MKnfN13U9RFY10+b6ZFNt3tmW y/OckQXfcPfKSiZSND2hCYIGUcuJ/i35egdjceLbNAHhftV7c38aCUs/4/qQiAC/uvu94 CNoN3zlljd38LcuXdFO6+SYw3VmtWmUYJkI= X-RZG-AUTH: :IW0NeWC8cvPlgn0IPTehqi9r6o/0DSXjJ1Me0yWdPTUrUVR0TMXac2ZAlsZ01c9KCKQ= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from dellschleppa (p549CCCE0.dip.t-dialin.net [84.156.204.224]) by post.strato.de (fruni mo11) (RZmta 18.18) with ESMTP id 000428l1GLKks2 ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:55:59 +0100 (MET) In-Reply-To: <2c6b72b30902151547q5bf183f2q1e846f261825671c@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.63 (Linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:47:05 +0100, Jonas Fonseca wrote: > I have thought about it. The question is if a separate view is > necessary or if the main view would do. For example, I sometimes use > gitk when I need to rename branches or prepare for rebasing a > patchset. One idea I would like to explore is to provide a compressed > version of the main view, where "intermediate" commits are hidden, > this way you could easily get a view of the relationship between > branches. After seeing ./gitk --simplify-by-decoration --all for the first time today I think now I know better what you mean. Nevertheless, compared to a separate branch-view, there are two points: - How to I select a branch, if there is more than one branch on one commit (and thus on one line) - Would it still be possible to create nice and fast one (or two) key commands for the most used every-day branch commands. Best regards, Tilo