From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Frans Klaver" Subject: Compile warnings Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:55:22 +0100 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "git@vger.kernel.org" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Nov 14 15:55:38 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RPxwe-0000SO-D0 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:55:36 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752432Ab1KNOz1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:55:27 -0500 Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com ([209.85.215.174]:44337 "EHLO mail-ey0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751999Ab1KNOz0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:55:26 -0500 Received: by eye27 with SMTP id 27so5069125eye.19 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 06:55:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:to:date:subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :from:message-id:user-agent; bh=mFTGSF3LcjFmbojHk7HmXZN5EGxMWMv+M4xmS/3ii30=; b=iMElGf3NDm8UjYT87us6ckWp7puYjIz7CcvQP3apaEYJYHt89n5DJVXac3FPdpARaz L1iHPDinbAAPHrzcoxCFoP+V5pOOOYeftfTnS9KXV+cm0W/vjH2qaDbYHYaUiM5+kokU m8cIzViZQmDxg4M8amJ2+zxLQTrmDEtJ2C1OU= Received: by 10.213.22.211 with SMTP id o19mr531565ebb.6.1321282525072; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 06:55:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from keputer (82-136-253-149.ip.telfort.nl. [82.136.253.149]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v3sm60597997eej.7.2011.11.14.06.55.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 14 Nov 2011 06:55:24 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.00 (Linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, Every now and then I see an 'unused result' warning come by during building. What is the general attitude towards these warnings? Remove them (by properly checking)? Or leave them be as a kind of documentation -- we know we're ignoring the info, but it's good to be reminded? Thanks, Frans