From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthias Urlichs Subject: Re: How is working on arbitrary remote heads supposed to work in Cogito (+ PATCH)? Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:47:40 +0200 Organization: {M:U} IT Consulting Message-ID: References: <200507271458.43063.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de> <7vll3rlnqm.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <200507271458.43063.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de> <20050728120806.GA2391@pasky.ji.cz> <20050728153506.GL14229@pasky.ji.cz> <20050728161815.GC17952@pasky.ji.cz> <7v1x5ic1pe.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20050728183904.GA24948@pasky.ji.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jul 28 21:54:31 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DyES7-0007mU-0S for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:53:59 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261549AbVG1TxV (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:53:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261437AbVG1TvA (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:51:00 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:19332 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261566AbVG1Tuu (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:50:50 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DyENS-00071Z-Sb for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:49:11 +0200 Received: from run.smurf.noris.de ([192.109.102.41]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:49:10 +0200 Received: from smurf by run.smurf.noris.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:49:10 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: run.smurf.noris.de User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table) X-Face: '&-&kxR\8+Pqalw@VzN\p?]]eIYwRDxvrwEM Are you really sure you want to slave git into being a "better > Subversion"? Since git is better than all of these, we should be able to easily write a SVN-like porcelain, so ... ;-) > IMHO, if you need a central repository, you should also have > one central HEAD. I disagree. Larger projects have multiple HEADs (stable, oldstable, development, ...). I don't like putting those in different repositories, you end up with a heap of housekeeping effort to hardlink duplicate objects, all of which is going to be wasted when different people run "git repack". Not everybody has 100-GB disks and multi-MB Internet pipes to play with... -- Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | smurf@smurf.noris.de Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de - - On ability: A dwarf is small, even if he stands on a mountain top; a colossus keeps his height, even if he stands in a well. -- Lucius Annaeus Seneca, 4BC - 65AD