From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anand Kumria Subject: Re: [PATCH] Removed the printf("rm 'file'") from git-rm. Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:38:59 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <11747590062554-git-send-email-tilman@code-monkey.de> <7vodmhc06f.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Mar 25 18:39:34 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HVVki-0001Er-JY for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:39:32 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751857AbXCYQjS (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Mar 2007 12:39:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751877AbXCYQjS (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Mar 2007 12:39:18 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:36781 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751857AbXCYQjS (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Mar 2007 12:39:18 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HVVkH-0000XM-TG for git@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:39:05 +0200 Received: from user-54463d31.lns2-c12.dsl.pol.co.uk ([84.70.61.49]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:39:05 +0200 Received: from wildfire by user-54463d31.lns2-c12.dsl.pol.co.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:39:05 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: user-54463d31.lns2-c12.dsl.pol.co.uk User-Agent: Pan/0.125 (Potzrebie) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 23:22:16 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Tilman Sauerbeck writes: > >> We used to print that, because you actually had to run the output of >> git-rm to get rid of the files before Git 1.5. Now that git-rm really >> removes the files, it's not needed anymore. > > Even though I admit I do not deeply care, as I never use 'git rm' > myself, I do not necessarily agree with "because" part. > > I suspect people are by now accustomed to see the assuring feedback from > the command when used this way: > > $ git rm -r one > rm 'one/1' > rm 'one/2' > rm 'one/3' Heh. I didn't even know there was a recursive option. So I'm definitely not 'accustomed' to any form of output. If me being a data point helps at all. Anand