From: "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>,
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ci(linux-asan-ubsan): let's save some time
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 20:47:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pull.1578.v2.git.1693342048633.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.1578.git.1693304963963.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Every once in a while, the `git-p4` tests flake for reasons outside of
our control. It typically fails with "Connection refused" e.g. here:
https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/5969707156/job/16196057724
[...]
+ git p4 clone --dest=/home/runner/work/git/git/t/trash directory.t9807-git-p4-submit/git //depot
Initialized empty Git repository in /home/runner/work/git/git/t/trash directory.t9807-git-p4-submit/git/.git/
Perforce client error:
Connect to server failed; check $P4PORT.
TCP connect to localhost:9807 failed.
connect: 127.0.0.1:9807: Connection refused
failure accessing depot: could not run p4
Importing from //depot into /home/runner/work/git/git/t/trash directory.t9807-git-p4-submit/git
[...]
This happens in other jobs, too, but in the `linux-asan-ubsan` job it
hurts the most because that job often takes over a full hour to run,
therefore re-running a failed `linux-asan-ubsan` job is _very_ costly.
The purpose of the `linux-asan-ubsan` job is to exercise the C code of
Git, anyway, and any part of Git's source code that the `git-p4` tests
run and that would benefit from the attention of ASAN/UBSAN are run
better in other tests anyway, as debugging C code run via Python scripts
can get a bit hairy.
In fact, it is not even just `git-p4` that is the problem (even if it
flakes often enough to be problematic in the CI builds), but really the
part about Python scripts. So let's just skip any Python parts of the
tests from being run in that job.
For good measure, also skip the Subversion tests because debugging C
code run via Perl scripts is as much fun as debugging C code run via
Python scripts. And it will reduce the time this very expensive job
takes, which is a big benefit.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
---
ci(linux-asan-ubsan): let's save some time
I often look at failed CI runs, and the linux-asan-ubsan job comes up
frequently, and painfully (because it takes such a long time that
re-running is often less desirable than getting the CI runs to pass).
This commit is an attempt to reduce the pain and suffering stemming from
this particular job, simply by deciding that the benefit of running the
Python/Subversion-related tests in that job is far outweighed by its
cost.
This commit not only reduces the number of git-p4 flakes in
linux-asan-ubsan to 0, it also seems to shave off about 10 minutes
runtime, comparing
https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/actions/runs/5929602548/job/16077585391
to
https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/actions/runs/6010305446/job/16301473243?pr=1578
(which is not quite scientific due to the lack of a controlled
environment, but it's the best we got for now). Together, those benefits
form a strong incentive for me to get this merged.
This patch is based on maint.
Changes since v1:
* Made the rationale clearer (it is not Python that flakes, but
Perforce).
* Touched up the commit message.
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-1578%2Fdscho%2Fskip-p4-from-asan-runs-v2
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-1578/dscho/skip-p4-from-asan-runs-v2
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/1578
Range-diff vs v1:
1: ac5b82ea934 ! 1: 1927a97667b ci(linux-asan-ubsan): let's save some time
@@ Commit message
better in other tests anyway, as debugging C code run via Python scripts
can get a bit hairy.
- In fact, it is not even `git-p4` that is the problem (even if it flakes
- often enough to be problematic in the CI builds), but really the part
- about Python scripts. So let's just skip any Python parts of the tests
- from being run in that job.
+ In fact, it is not even just `git-p4` that is the problem (even if it
+ flakes often enough to be problematic in the CI builds), but really the
+ part about Python scripts. So let's just skip any Python parts of the
+ tests from being run in that job.
For good measure, also skip the Subversion tests because debugging C
code run via Perl scripts is as much fun as debugging C code run via
@@ ci/lib.sh: linux-leaks)
;;
linux-asan-ubsan)
export SANITIZE=address,undefined
-+ export NO_SVN_TESTS=LetsSaveSomeTimeBack
-+ MAKEFLAGS="$MAKEFLAGS NO_PYTHON=YepItFlakesTooOften"
++ export NO_SVN_TESTS=LetsSaveSomeTime
++ MAKEFLAGS="$MAKEFLAGS NO_PYTHON=YepBecauseP4FlakesTooOften"
;;
esac
ci/lib.sh | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/ci/lib.sh b/ci/lib.sh
index 369d462f130..6fbb5bade12 100755
--- a/ci/lib.sh
+++ b/ci/lib.sh
@@ -280,6 +280,8 @@ linux-leaks)
;;
linux-asan-ubsan)
export SANITIZE=address,undefined
+ export NO_SVN_TESTS=LetsSaveSomeTime
+ MAKEFLAGS="$MAKEFLAGS NO_PYTHON=YepBecauseP4FlakesTooOften"
;;
esac
base-commit: 43c8a30d150ecede9709c1f2527c8fba92c65f40
--
gitgitgadget
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-29 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-29 10:29 [PATCH] ci(linux-asan-ubsan): let's save some time Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2023-08-29 16:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-08-29 20:47 ` Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget [this message]
2023-08-29 21:51 ` [PATCH v2] " Junio C Hamano
2023-08-30 0:28 ` Jeff King
2023-08-30 6:19 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=pull.1578.v2.git.1693342048633.gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--to=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).