From: "Lidong Yan via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lidong Yan <502024330056@smail.nju.edu.cn>,
Lidong Yan <502024330056@smail.nju.edu.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] pack-bitmap: remove checks before bitmap_free
Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 05:09:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pull.1977.git.git.1748149783383.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (raw)
From: Lidong Yan <502024330056@smail.nju.edu.cn>
In pack-bitmap.c:find_boundary_objects, we build a roots_bitmap and
cascade it to cb.base. However, I’m wondering why we only free
roots_bitmap when the cascade succeeds. It seems we could safely remove
this check and always free roots_bitmap afterward, which might provide
some performance benefits.
Signed-off-by: Lidong Yan <502024330056@smail.nju.edu.cn>
---
pack-bitmap: remove checks before bitmap_free
In pack-bitmap.c:find_boundary_objects, remove cascade success check and
always free roots_bitmap afterward to make static analysis tool works
better.
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-1977%2Fbrandb97%2Fremove-check-before-bitmap-free-v1
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-1977/brandb97/remove-check-before-bitmap-free-v1
Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/1977
pack-bitmap.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/pack-bitmap.c b/pack-bitmap.c
index ac6d62b980c..8727f316de9 100644
--- a/pack-bitmap.c
+++ b/pack-bitmap.c
@@ -1363,8 +1363,8 @@ static struct bitmap *find_boundary_objects(struct bitmap_index *bitmap_git,
bitmap_set(roots_bitmap, pos);
}
- if (!cascade_pseudo_merges_1(bitmap_git, cb.base, roots_bitmap))
- bitmap_free(roots_bitmap);
+ cascade_pseudo_merges_1(bitmap_git, cb.base, roots_bitmap);
+ bitmap_free(roots_bitmap);
}
/*
base-commit: 845c48a16a7f7b2c44d8cb137b16a4a1f0140229
--
gitgitgadget
next reply other threads:[~2025-05-25 5:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-25 5:09 Lidong Yan via GitGitGadget [this message]
2025-05-26 6:49 ` [PATCH] pack-bitmap: remove checks before bitmap_free Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-26 16:05 ` lidongyan
2025-05-30 18:14 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Lidong Yan via GitGitGadget
2025-05-30 18:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Lidong Yan via GitGitGadget
2025-05-30 18:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] t5333: test memory leak when use pseudo-merge in boundary traversal Lidong Yan via GitGitGadget
2025-05-30 21:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-30 21:50 ` Eric Sunshine
2025-05-31 3:18 ` lidongyan
2025-05-30 21:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] pack-bitmap: remove checks before bitmap_free Junio C Hamano
2025-06-03 1:46 ` [PATCH v3] " Lidong Yan via GitGitGadget
2025-06-03 6:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-03 6:22 ` lidongyan
2025-06-03 15:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-03 15:32 ` lidongyan
2025-06-04 12:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-04 12:43 ` lidongyan
2025-06-04 14:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-03 6:20 ` [PATCH v4] " Lidong Yan via GitGitGadget
2025-06-03 22:09 ` Taylor Blau
2025-06-04 2:50 ` lidongyan
2025-06-05 6:24 ` [PATCH v5] " Lidong Yan via GitGitGadget
2025-06-05 15:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-10 5:58 ` lidongyan
2025-06-05 15:53 ` [PATCH v6] " Lidong Yan via GitGitGadget
2025-06-06 1:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-06 5:49 ` lidongyan
2025-06-09 8:18 ` [PATCH v7] " Lidong Yan via GitGitGadget
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=pull.1977.git.git.1748149783383.gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--to=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=502024330056@smail.nju.edu.cn \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).