From: "Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Objects treated as missing despite being present, due to race with geometric repacking
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 22:34:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pull.2207.git.1787092446.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (raw)
When an object is found in multiple packs that are in a multi-pack-index,
and a subsequent geometric repacking creates a new multi-pack-index and
removes the pack that was considered the owner of the object in the old
multi-pack-index, then an already-running process that had opened the old
multi-pack-index and hadn't yet opened the removed packfile will not be able
to access the object -- lookups will return it as missing. Additionally,
replay has a separate bug where a missing object causes a SIGSEGV rather
than an error message.
This appears to affect a very small percentage of git operations in
production since it is a tiny window, but I've found evidence of it
occurring in at least eight distinct server-side operations, covering seven
different git commands:
git operation symptom
----------------------------------- -----------------------------
git replay (server-side rebase) SIGSEGV (this series, 1/2)
git merge-tree spurious read-miss failure
git diff (raw and tree-vs-tree) spurious read-miss failure
git rev-list --count spurious read-miss failure
git merge-base spurious read-miss failure
object/rev resolution (rev-parse, spurious read-miss failure
cat-file)
repository repair (fsck/repack) spurious read-miss failure
There are also commands that could be changing behavior without throwing an
error -- e.g. object negotiation thinking an object doesn't exist and
instead negotiating based on an older common commit, or cat-file --batch
reporting that some objects don't exist.
This series fixes the replay bug first, since it's simpler; investigating
it, together with my other recent repacking work, is what led me to the
underlying multi-pack-index issue that 2/2 addresses.
Elijah Newren (2):
replay: fail gracefully when a merge input is unreadable
packfile: recover when a multi-pack-index names a removed pack
odb/source-packed.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
replay.c | 7 +++++++
t/t3650-replay-basics.sh | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
t/t5319-multi-pack-index.sh | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 111 insertions(+)
base-commit: 18e66859d87fb4b76599f73460b54f0848c76b16
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-2207%2Fnewren%2Fmidx-removed-pack-recovery-v1
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-2207/newren/midx-removed-pack-recovery-v1
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/2207
--
gitgitgadget
next reply other threads:[~2026-08-18 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-18 22:34 Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget [this message]
2026-08-18 22:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] replay: fail gracefully when a merge input is unreadable Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2026-08-18 22:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] packfile: recover when a multi-pack-index names a removed pack Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=pull.2207.git.1787092446.gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--to=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox