From: "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>,
Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com>,
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] Re-fix rebase -i with SHA-1 collisions
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 12:28:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pull.529.v3.git.1579782499.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.529.v2.git.1579304283.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Triggered by one of brian's SHA-256 patch series, I looked at the reason why
the SHA-1 collision test case passed when it shouldn't. Turns out that the
regression test was not quite thorough enough, and the interactive rebase
did regress recently.
While in the area, I realized that the same bug exists in the code backing
the rebase.missingCommitsCheck feature: the backed-up todo list uses
shortened commit IDs that may very well become ambiguous during the rebase.
For good measure, this patch series fixes that, too.
Finally, I saw that git rebase --edit-todo reported the line in an awkward,
maybe even incorrect, way when there was an ambiguous commit ID, and I also
fixed that.
To make sure that the code can be easily adapted to SHA-256 after these
patches, I actually already made those adjustments on top and offered them
up at https://github.com/bk2204/git/pull/1.
Changes since v2:
* Clarified in the first commit message that the change from a positive
return value to a negative return value (to indicate failure, in both
cases) both was intentional, and does not require any change in the
corresponding function's only caller.
Changes since v1:
* Turned the error condition when parsing the todo list with just-expanded
commit IDs failed into a BUG().
Johannes Schindelin (3):
parse_insn_line(): improve error message when parsing failed
rebase -i: re-fix short SHA-1 collision
rebase -i: also avoid SHA-1 collisions with missingCommitsCheck
rebase-interactive.c | 8 +++++---
sequencer.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh | 17 +++++++++++++++--
3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
base-commit: d0654dc308b0ba76dd8ed7bbb33c8d8f7aacd783
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-529%2Fdscho%2Fre-fix-rebase-i-with-sha-collisions-v3
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-529/dscho/re-fix-rebase-i-with-sha-collisions-v3
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/529
Range-diff vs v2:
1: 2ae2e435b0 ! 1: 6f5c7b0325 parse_insn_line(): improve error message when parsing failed
@@ -7,6 +7,11 @@
That makes it rather hard for users to understand what is going wrong,
so let's fix that.
+ While at it, return a negative value from `parse_insn_line()` in case of
+ an error, as per our convention. This function's only caller,
+ `todo_list_parse_insn_buffer()`, cares only whether that return value is
+ non-zero or not, i.e. does not need to be changed.
+
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
2: 102fa568dc = 2: 595ba81e09 rebase -i: re-fix short SHA-1 collision
3: 486e9413a6 = 3: b7b063408f rebase -i: also avoid SHA-1 collisions with missingCommitsCheck
--
gitgitgadget
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-23 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-16 21:18 [PATCH 0/3] Re-fix rebase -i with SHA-1 collisions Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2020-01-16 21:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] parse_insn_line(): improve error message when parsing failed Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2020-01-17 18:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-01-16 21:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] rebase -i: re-fix short SHA-1 collision Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2020-01-17 18:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-01-17 21:31 ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-01-16 21:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] rebase -i: also avoid SHA-1 collisions with missingCommitsCheck Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2020-01-16 23:54 ` [PATCH 0/3] Re-fix rebase -i with SHA-1 collisions brian m. carlson
2020-01-17 9:51 ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-01-17 22:37 ` brian m. carlson
2020-01-21 18:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-01-17 23:38 ` [PATCH v2 " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2020-01-17 23:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] parse_insn_line(): improve error message when parsing failed Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2020-01-21 22:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-01-23 12:26 ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-01-17 23:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] rebase -i: re-fix short SHA-1 collision Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2020-01-20 16:49 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-01-20 20:04 ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-01-20 20:08 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-01-21 11:49 ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-01-21 22:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-01-22 14:10 ` Johannes Schindelin
2020-01-22 18:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-01-17 23:38 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] rebase -i: also avoid SHA-1 collisions with missingCommitsCheck Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2020-01-23 12:28 ` Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget [this message]
2020-01-23 12:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] parse_insn_line(): improve error message when parsing failed Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2020-01-23 12:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] rebase -i: re-fix short SHA-1 collision Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2020-01-23 12:28 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] rebase -i: also avoid SHA-1 collisions with missingCommitsCheck Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=pull.529.v3.git.1579782499.gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--to=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=alban.gruin@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).