From: "Stephen Manz via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
Stephen Manz <smanz@alum.mit.edu>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/3] worktree: teach add to accept --reason with --lock
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 02:32:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pull.992.v4.git.1626316350.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.992.v3.git.1625963240.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
The default reason stored in the lock file, "added with --lock", is unlikely
to be what the user would have given in a separate git worktree lock
command. Allowing --reason to be specified along with --lock when adding a
working tree gives the user control over the reason for locking without
needing a second command.
Changes since v3:
* Updated test to define a shell variable, lock_reason, set to "why not".
Expand the variable to use with --reason and to echo to file, expected.
This avoids the spacing comment made by Eric Sunshine.
Changes since v2:
* Updated first of the 3 commits to include a step in the test to unlock
the worktree when test completes and modified commit message accordingly.
* Updated second commit to wrap "initializing" string with _() to mark it
for translation, as requested. I had originally opted not to mark it,
since, when --lock is not given, file locked gets removed after the
working tree is populated. Thus, it's not really user-facing. Modified
the commit message accordingly.
* Updated the third commit to have no new lock_reason member of struct
add_opts and changed type of member keep_locked from int to const char *,
as suggested.
The file, .git/worktrees/name-of-worktree/locked, is created even if --lock
isn't given, although only temporarily. In this instance, "initializing" is
written to the file, but the file is removed at the end of the add-worktree
operation. My goal was to maintain this behavior and is the reason my
post-parsing code doesn't quite match the suggested patch.
Changes since v1:
* Split changes into 3 commits. The first commit is removal of git
rev-parse in the test above the ones I'm adding. The second is wrapping
the "added with --lock" string with _() to mark it for translation. The
third commit is the main change.
* Reworked the if-else-if-else to if-else if-else
* Added test_when_finished ... command to unlock the working tree
* Changed test_expect_failure to test_expect_success and embedded
test_must_fail and test_path_is_missing commands
Note: I don't see how to disambiguate --lock with no --reason from no --lock
at all. I still think that the original keep_locked boolean is needed along
with the new lock_reason char array. If I don't add lock_reason and change
keep_locked to a char array, it will start as NULL. But it will remain NULL
if --lock alone is given or if --lock isn't given at all.
cc: Eric Sunshine sunshine@sunshineco.com
Stephen Manz (3):
t2400: clean up '"add" worktree with lock' test
worktree: mark lock strings with `_()` for translation
worktree: teach `add` to accept --reason <string> with --lock
Documentation/git-worktree.txt | 4 ++--
builtin/worktree.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
t/t2400-worktree-add.sh | 16 +++++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
base-commit: d486ca60a51c9cb1fe068803c3f540724e95e83a
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-992%2FSRManz%2Flock_reason-v4
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-992/SRManz/lock_reason-v4
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/992
Range-diff vs v3:
1: 5618933279d = 1: 5618933279d t2400: clean up '"add" worktree with lock' test
2: ceb7a58b004 = 2: ceb7a58b004 worktree: mark lock strings with `_()` for translation
3: 9a414a3078b ! 3: 4b6bb50d3d6 worktree: teach `add` to accept --reason <string> with --lock
@@ t/t2400-worktree-add.sh: test_expect_success '"add" worktree with lock' '
'
+test_expect_success '"add" worktree with lock and reason' '
-+ git worktree add --detach --lock --reason "why not" here-with-lock-reason main &&
++ lock_reason="why not" &&
++ git worktree add --detach --lock --reason "$lock_reason" here-with-lock-reason main &&
+ test_when_finished "git worktree unlock here-with-lock-reason || :" &&
+ test -f .git/worktrees/here-with-lock-reason/locked &&
-+ echo why not >expect &&
++ echo "$lock_reason" >expect &&
+ test_cmp expect .git/worktrees/here-with-lock-reason/locked
+'
+
--
gitgitgadget
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-15 2:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-06 5:47 [PATCH] worktree: teach `add` to accept --reason <string> with --lock Stephen Manz via GitGitGadget
2021-07-06 6:19 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-07-06 19:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-09 6:11 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-07-09 15:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-10 7:11 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-07-08 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] worktree: teach add to accept --reason " Stephen Manz via GitGitGadget
2021-07-08 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] t2400: remove unneeded `git rev-parse` from '"add" worktree with lock' test Stephen Manz via GitGitGadget
2021-07-08 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] worktree: default lock string should be marked with `_()` for translation Stephen Manz via GitGitGadget
2021-07-09 6:19 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-07-09 15:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-08 15:50 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] worktree: teach `add` to accept --reason <string> with --lock Stephen Manz via GitGitGadget
2021-07-09 7:45 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] worktree: teach add to accept --reason " Eric Sunshine
2021-07-09 16:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-07-10 7:15 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-07-11 0:27 ` [PATCH v3 " Stephen Manz via GitGitGadget
2021-07-11 0:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] t2400: clean up '"add" worktree with lock' test Stephen Manz via GitGitGadget
2021-07-11 0:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] worktree: mark lock strings with `_()` for translation Stephen Manz via GitGitGadget
2021-07-11 0:27 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] worktree: teach `add` to accept --reason <string> with --lock Stephen Manz via GitGitGadget
2021-07-13 3:37 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-07-13 3:47 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] worktree: teach add to accept --reason " Eric Sunshine
2021-07-15 2:32 ` Stephen Manz via GitGitGadget [this message]
2021-07-15 2:32 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] t2400: clean up '"add" worktree with lock' test Stephen Manz via GitGitGadget
2021-07-15 2:32 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] worktree: mark lock strings with `_()` for translation Stephen Manz via GitGitGadget
2021-07-15 2:32 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] worktree: teach `add` to accept --reason <string> with --lock Stephen Manz via GitGitGadget
2021-07-15 17:17 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] worktree: teach add to accept --reason " Eric Sunshine
2021-07-17 0:14 ` Eric Sunshine
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=pull.992.v4.git.1626316350.gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--to=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=smanz@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).