From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sitaram Chamarty Subject: Re: hooks/post-update execs git-update-server-info Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 01:27:24 +0000 (UTC) Organization: disorganised! Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Dec 16 02:29:15 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LCOk7-0007Kw-MO for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 02:29:00 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751442AbYLPB1k (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:27:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751406AbYLPB1k (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:27:40 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:35411 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751350AbYLPB1j (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:27:39 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LCOik-0001n8-Jk for git@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 01:27:34 +0000 Received: from atcmail.atc.tcs.co.in ([203.200.212.145]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 01:27:34 +0000 Received: from sitaramc by atcmail.atc.tcs.co.in with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 01:27:34 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: atcmail.atc.tcs.co.in User-Agent: slrn/0.9.9 (Linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 2008-12-15, Jakub Narebski wrote: > Sitaram Chamarty writes: >> shouldn't .git/hooks/post-update contain "exec git >> update-server-info" (note the space not hyphen) instead of > If I understand correctly hooks run with GIT_EXEC_PATH prepended to > PATH, so everything should work; and it has to work to not force users you're right -- it does. There was something else wrong in my quick-and-dirty testing that caused me to jump to the wrong conclusion; sorry for the noise!