* Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+
2010-02-20 22:22 ` Johannes Schindelin
@ 2010-04-02 7:29 ` Michal Sojka
2010-04-02 7:43 ` Jonathan Nieder
` (16 more replies)
0 siblings, 17 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Michal Sojka @ 2010-04-02 7:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
To all contributors to test-lib.sh mentioned in Bcc:
You're getting this message because you're recorded as contributing one
or more changes to the test-lib.sh file in the Git project, and are
therefore one of many copyright holders in the file.
We would like to extend the license of that file from GPLv2 only
license to GPLv2+ by adding the recommended "or any later version"
clause to the license. This will give us license compatibility with
GPLv3 projects, which would like to reuse test-lib.sh.
Please respond to this email with one of the following:
YES, I agree to relicense all my contributions to test-lib.sh to GPLv2+
with the addition of the "or any later version" clause.
NO, I would rather not, please send me more email to convince me.
I'm putting your address to Bcc as most people are probably not
interested in receiving responses from dozens of other people. I will
track the status of received responses at
https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Test-lib_reclicensing. Please do
not remove git@vger.kernel.org when responding so that your response is
available to everyone.
Thanks!
Michal Sojka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+
2010-04-02 7:29 ` Git: relicensing test-lib.sh " Michal Sojka
@ 2010-04-02 7:43 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-04-02 7:43 ` Petr Baudis
` (15 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Nieder @ 2010-04-02 7:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Sojka; +Cc: git
Hi Michal,
I am happy for anyone to use, modify, distribute, and relicense my
meagre contribution to t/test-lib.sh in any way they please.
In particular: yes, I agree to relicense all my contributions to
test-lib.sh to GPLv2+ with the addition of the "or any later version"
clause.
Thanks,
Jonathan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+
2010-04-02 7:29 ` Git: relicensing test-lib.sh " Michal Sojka
2010-04-02 7:43 ` Jonathan Nieder
@ 2010-04-02 7:43 ` Petr Baudis
2010-04-02 7:51 ` Michal Sojka
2010-04-02 8:59 ` Clemens Buchacher
2010-04-02 8:00 ` Matthias Lederhofer
` (14 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 2 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Petr Baudis @ 2010-04-02 7:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Sojka; +Cc: git
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 09:29:11AM +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> We would like to extend the license of that file from GPLv2 only
> license to GPLv2+ by adding the recommended "or any later version"
> clause to the license. This will give us license compatibility with
> GPLv3 projects, which would like to reuse test-lib.sh.
Huh, didn't we just run through this about a month ago? Is this some
kind of stale e-mail message?
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+
2010-04-02 7:43 ` Petr Baudis
@ 2010-04-02 7:51 ` Michal Sojka
2010-04-02 8:10 ` Petr Baudis
2010-04-02 8:59 ` Clemens Buchacher
1 sibling, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Michal Sojka @ 2010-04-02 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Petr Baudis; +Cc: git
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010, Petr Baudis wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 09:29:11AM +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > We would like to extend the license of that file from GPLv2 only
> > license to GPLv2+ by adding the recommended "or any later version"
> > clause to the license. This will give us license compatibility with
> > GPLv3 projects, which would like to reuse test-lib.sh.
>
> Huh, didn't we just run through this about a month ago? Is this some
> kind of stale e-mail message?
The month ago, I didn't contact *ALL* contributors, but only the ones
with significat contribution. Now I want to finish relicensing by
contacting all contributors as sugested in some responses.
-Michal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+
2010-04-02 7:29 ` Git: relicensing test-lib.sh " Michal Sojka
2010-04-02 7:43 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-04-02 7:43 ` Petr Baudis
@ 2010-04-02 8:00 ` Matthias Lederhofer
2010-04-02 8:08 ` Lea Wiemann
` (13 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Lederhofer @ 2010-04-02 8:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Sojka; +Cc: git
Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> wrote:
> To all contributors to test-lib.sh mentioned in Bcc:
>
> You're getting this message because you're recorded as contributing one
> or more changes to the test-lib.sh file in the Git project, and are
> therefore one of many copyright holders in the file.
>
> We would like to extend the license of that file from GPLv2 only
> license to GPLv2+ by adding the recommended "or any later version"
> clause to the license. This will give us license compatibility with
> GPLv3 projects, which would like to reuse test-lib.sh.
YES, I agree to relicense all my contributions to test-lib.sh to GPLv2+
with the addition of the "or any later version" clause.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+
2010-04-02 7:29 ` Git: relicensing test-lib.sh " Michal Sojka
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-02 8:00 ` Matthias Lederhofer
@ 2010-04-02 8:08 ` Lea Wiemann
2010-04-02 8:13 ` Michele Ballabio
` (12 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Lea Wiemann @ 2010-04-02 8:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Sojka; +Cc: git
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 03:29, Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> wrote:
> We would like to extend the license of that file from GPLv2 only
> license to GPLv2+ by adding the recommended "or any later version"
> clause to the license. This will give us license compatibility with
> GPLv3 projects, which would like to reuse test-lib.sh.
>
> YES, I agree to relicense all my contributions to test-lib.sh to GPLv2+
> with the addition of the "or any later version" clause.
Yes.
-- Lea
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+
2010-04-02 7:51 ` Michal Sojka
@ 2010-04-02 8:10 ` Petr Baudis
2010-04-02 8:27 ` Michal Sojka
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Petr Baudis @ 2010-04-02 8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Sojka; +Cc: git
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Apr 2010, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 09:29:11AM +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > > We would like to extend the license of that file from GPLv2 only
> > > license to GPLv2+ by adding the recommended "or any later version"
> > > clause to the license. This will give us license compatibility with
> > > GPLv3 projects, which would like to reuse test-lib.sh.
> >
> > Huh, didn't we just run through this about a month ago? Is this some
> > kind of stale e-mail message?
>
> The month ago, I didn't contact *ALL* contributors, but only the ones
> with significat contribution. Now I want to finish relicensing by
> contacting all contributors as sugested in some responses.
Then perhaps you should exclude those who already replied earlier?
It seems to me the list on the wiki is quite similar in magnitude to
the recipient list of the last mail, surely there's no need to bother
everyone again just for few extra people?
--
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
http://pasky.or.cz/ | "Ars longa, vita brevis." -- Hippocrates
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+
2010-04-02 7:29 ` Git: relicensing test-lib.sh " Michal Sojka
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-02 8:08 ` Lea Wiemann
@ 2010-04-02 8:13 ` Michele Ballabio
2010-04-02 8:52 ` Clemens Buchacher
` (11 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Michele Ballabio @ 2010-04-02 8:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Sojka; +Cc: git
On Friday 02 April 2010, Michal Sojka wrote:
> To all contributors to test-lib.sh mentioned in Bcc:
>
> You're getting this message because you're recorded as contributing one
> or more changes to the test-lib.sh file in the Git project, and are
> therefore one of many copyright holders in the file.
>
> We would like to extend the license of that file from GPLv2 only
> license to GPLv2+ by adding the recommended "or any later version"
> clause to the license. This will give us license compatibility with
> GPLv3 projects, which would like to reuse test-lib.sh.
YES, I agree to relicense all my contributions to test-lib.sh to GPLv2+
with the addition of the "or any later version" clause.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+
2010-04-02 8:10 ` Petr Baudis
@ 2010-04-02 8:27 ` Michal Sojka
2010-04-02 16:54 ` Jeff King
0 siblings, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Michal Sojka @ 2010-04-02 8:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Petr Baudis; +Cc: git
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010, Petr Baudis wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > On Fri, 02 Apr 2010, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 09:29:11AM +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > > > We would like to extend the license of that file from GPLv2 only
> > > > license to GPLv2+ by adding the recommended "or any later version"
> > > > clause to the license. This will give us license compatibility with
> > > > GPLv3 projects, which would like to reuse test-lib.sh.
> > >
> > > Huh, didn't we just run through this about a month ago? Is this some
> > > kind of stale e-mail message?
> >
> > The month ago, I didn't contact *ALL* contributors, but only the ones
> > with significat contribution. Now I want to finish relicensing by
> > contacting all contributors as sugested in some responses.
>
> Then perhaps you should exclude those who already replied earlier?
> It seems to me the list on the wiki is quite similar in magnitude to
> the recipient list of the last mail, surely there's no need to bother
> everyone again just for few extra people?
That's exactly what I did. I excluded those who stated explicitely that
they agree. Shall I take your response as an agreement?
Michal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+
2010-04-02 7:29 ` Git: relicensing test-lib.sh " Michal Sojka
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-02 8:13 ` Michele Ballabio
@ 2010-04-02 8:52 ` Clemens Buchacher
2010-04-02 11:43 ` Miklos Vajna
` (10 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Clemens Buchacher @ 2010-04-02 8:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Sojka; +Cc: git
YES, I agree to relicense all my contributions to test-lib.sh to GPLv2+
with the addition of the "or any later version" clause.
Clemens
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+
2010-04-02 7:43 ` Petr Baudis
2010-04-02 7:51 ` Michal Sojka
@ 2010-04-02 8:59 ` Clemens Buchacher
2010-04-02 17:19 ` Johan Herland
1 sibling, 1 reply; 25+ messages in thread
From: Clemens Buchacher @ 2010-04-02 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Petr Baudis
Cc: Michal Sojka, git, Johan Herland, Brandon Casey, Miklos Vajna,
Shawn O. Pearce, Alex Riesen
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 09:43:43AM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Huh, didn't we just run through this about a month ago? Is this some
> kind of stale e-mail message?
Yes. I'm afraid that E-Mail never made it to the list or to Michael, because
neither were Cc'ed. Including myself, I got positive replies from the
following contributors.
Johan Herland
Brandon Casey
Petr Baudis
Miklos Vajna
Shawn O. Pearce
It's probably best if you guys reply here again, for the record.
Clemens
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+
2010-04-02 7:29 ` Git: relicensing test-lib.sh " Michal Sojka
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-02 8:52 ` Clemens Buchacher
@ 2010-04-02 11:43 ` Miklos Vajna
2010-04-02 15:51 ` Alex Riesen
` (9 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Miklos Vajna @ 2010-04-02 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Sojka; +Cc: git
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 490 bytes --]
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 09:29:11AM +0200, Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> wrote:
> Please respond to this email with one of the following:
>
> YES, I agree to relicense all my contributions to test-lib.sh to GPLv2+
> with the addition of the "or any later version" clause.
>
> NO, I would rather not, please send me more email to convince me.
YES, I agree to relicense all my contributions to test-lib.sh to GPLv2+
with the addition of the "or any later version" clause.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+
2010-04-02 7:29 ` Git: relicensing test-lib.sh " Michal Sojka
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-02 11:43 ` Miklos Vajna
@ 2010-04-02 15:51 ` Alex Riesen
2010-04-02 16:31 ` David Reiss
` (8 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Alex Riesen @ 2010-04-02 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Sojka; +Cc: git
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 09:29, Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> wrote:
> YES, I agree to relicense all my contributions to test-lib.sh to GPLv2+
> with the addition of the "or any later version" clause.
I'm fine with the change.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+
2010-04-02 7:29 ` Git: relicensing test-lib.sh " Michal Sojka
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-02 15:51 ` Alex Riesen
@ 2010-04-02 16:31 ` David Reiss
2010-04-02 16:43 ` Christian Couder
` (7 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: David Reiss @ 2010-04-02 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Sojka; +Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
YES, I agree to relicense all my contributions to test-lib.sh to GPLv2+
with the addition of the "or any later version" clause.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+
2010-04-02 7:29 ` Git: relicensing test-lib.sh " Michal Sojka
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-02 16:31 ` David Reiss
@ 2010-04-02 16:43 ` Christian Couder
2010-04-02 20:38 ` Jakub Narebski
` (6 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Christian Couder @ 2010-04-02 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Sojka; +Cc: git
On Friday 02 April 2010 09:29:11 Michal Sojka wrote:
> To all contributors to test-lib.sh mentioned in Bcc:
>
> You're getting this message because you're recorded as contributing one
> or more changes to the test-lib.sh file in the Git project, and are
> therefore one of many copyright holders in the file.
>
> We would like to extend the license of that file from GPLv2 only
> license to GPLv2+ by adding the recommended "or any later version"
> clause to the license. This will give us license compatibility with
> GPLv3 projects, which would like to reuse test-lib.sh.
>
> Please respond to this email with one of the following:
>
> YES, I agree to relicense all my contributions to test-lib.sh to GPLv2+
> with the addition of the "or any later version" clause.
>
> NO, I would rather not, please send me more email to convince me.
>
> I'm putting your address to Bcc as most people are probably not
> interested in receiving responses from dozens of other people. I will
> track the status of received responses at
> https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Test-lib_reclicensing. Please do
> not remove git@vger.kernel.org when responding so that your response is
> available to everyone.
YES, I agree to relicense all my contributions to test-lib.sh to GPLv2+
with the addition of the "or any later version" clause.
Thanks,
Christian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+
2010-04-02 8:27 ` Michal Sojka
@ 2010-04-02 16:54 ` Jeff King
0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Jeff King @ 2010-04-02 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Sojka; +Cc: Petr Baudis, git
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 10:27:39AM +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > Then perhaps you should exclude those who already replied earlier?
> > It seems to me the list on the wiki is quite similar in magnitude to
> > the recipient list of the last mail, surely there's no need to bother
> > everyone again just for few extra people?
>
> That's exactly what I did. I excluded those who stated explicitely that
> they agree. Shall I take your response as an agreement?
I'm not sure how you did it, but I already assented in the earlier
thread (and am listed on the wiki) and still got the mail. But anyway,
to be very clear:
YES, I agree to relicense all my contributions to test-lib.sh to
GPLv2+ with the addition of the "or any later version" clause.
-Peff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+
2010-04-02 8:59 ` Clemens Buchacher
@ 2010-04-02 17:19 ` Johan Herland
0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Johan Herland @ 2010-04-02 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Clemens Buchacher, Petr Baudis
Cc: Michal Sojka, git, Brandon Casey, Miklos Vajna, Shawn O. Pearce,
Alex Riesen
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2010, Petr Baudis wrote:
>
> > Huh, didn't we just run through this about a month ago? Is this some
> > kind of stale e-mail message?
>
> Yes. I'm afraid that E-Mail never made it to the list or to Michael, because
> neither were Cc'ed. Including myself, I got positive replies from the
> following contributors.
>
> Johan Herland
For the record, I'm still ok with the license change.
...Johan
> Brandon Casey
> Petr Baudis
> Miklos Vajna
> Shawn O. Pearce
>
> It's probably best if you guys reply here again, for the record.
>
> Clemens
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+
2010-04-02 7:29 ` Git: relicensing test-lib.sh " Michal Sojka
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-02 16:43 ` Christian Couder
@ 2010-04-02 20:38 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-04-04 11:56 ` Robin Rosenberg
` (5 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Narebski @ 2010-04-02 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Sojka; +Cc: git
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010, Michal Sojka wrote:
> To all contributors to test-lib.sh mentioned in Bcc:
>
> You're getting this message because you're recorded as contributing one
> or more changes to the test-lib.sh file in the Git project, and are
> therefore one of many copyright holders in the file.
>
> We would like to extend the license of that file from GPLv2 only
> license to GPLv2+ by adding the recommended "or any later version"
> clause to the license. This will give us license compatibility with
> GPLv3 projects, which would like to reuse test-lib.sh.
>
> Please respond to this email with one of the following:
>
> YES, I agree to relicense all my contributions to test-lib.sh to GPLv2+
> with the addition of the "or any later version" clause.
>
> NO, I would rather not, please send me more email to convince me.
As I said earlier, I don't think my contribution is significant enough
(and large enough) to be copyrightable. But again:
YES, I agree to relicense all my contributions to test-lib.sh to GPLv2+
with the addition of the "or any later version" clause.
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+
2010-04-02 7:29 ` Git: relicensing test-lib.sh " Michal Sojka
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-02 20:38 ` Jakub Narebski
@ 2010-04-04 11:56 ` Robin Rosenberg
2010-04-04 13:11 ` Michael J Gruber
` (4 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Robin Rosenberg @ 2010-04-04 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Sojka; +Cc: git
fredagen den 2 april 2010 09.29.11 skrev Michal Sojka:
> To all contributors to test-lib.sh mentioned in Bcc:
>
> You're getting this message because you're recorded as contributing one
> or more changes to the test-lib.sh file in the Git project, and are
> therefore one of many copyright holders in the file.
>
> We would like to extend the license of that file from GPLv2 only
> license to GPLv2+ by adding the recommended "or any later version"
> clause to the license. This will give us license compatibility with
> GPLv3 projects, which would like to reuse test-lib.sh.
YES, I agree to relicense all my contributions to test-lib.sh to GPLv2+
with the addition of the "or any later version" clause.
-- robin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+
2010-04-02 7:29 ` Git: relicensing test-lib.sh " Michal Sojka
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-04 11:56 ` Robin Rosenberg
@ 2010-04-04 13:11 ` Michael J Gruber
2010-04-04 17:41 ` Matthew Ogilvie
` (3 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Michael J Gruber @ 2010-04-04 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Sojka, git
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 09:29 +0200, "Michal Sojka" <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
wrote:
> To all contributors to test-lib.sh mentioned in Bcc:
>
> You're getting this message because you're recorded as contributing one
> or more changes to the test-lib.sh file in the Git project, and are
> therefore one of many copyright holders in the file.
>
> We would like to extend the license of that file from GPLv2 only
> license to GPLv2+ by adding the recommended "or any later version"
> clause to the license. This will give us license compatibility with
> GPLv3 projects, which would like to reuse test-lib.sh.
>
> Please respond to this email with one of the following:
>
> YES, I agree to relicense all my contributions to test-lib.sh to GPLv2+
> with the addition of the "or any later version" clause.
>
> NO, I would rather not, please send me more email to convince me.
>
> I'm putting your address to Bcc as most people are probably not
> interested in receiving responses from dozens of other people. I will
> track the status of received responses at
> https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Test-lib_reclicensing. Please do
> not remove git@vger.kernel.org when responding so that your response is
> available to everyone.
What else do I need to do besides my acked-by to Junio's patch in
<4B8E1EBA.4090406@drmicha.warpmail.net> on 3/3?
For whatever's sake:
> YES, I agree to relicense all my contributions to test-lib.sh to GPLv2+
> with the addition of the "or any later version" clause.
Michael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+
2010-04-02 7:29 ` Git: relicensing test-lib.sh " Michal Sojka
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-04 13:11 ` Michael J Gruber
@ 2010-04-04 17:41 ` Matthew Ogilvie
2010-04-05 12:16 ` Gerrit Pape
` (2 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Ogilvie @ 2010-04-04 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Sojka; +Cc: git
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 09:29:11AM +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> Please respond to this email with one of the following:
>
> YES, I agree to relicense all my contributions to test-lib.sh to GPLv2+
> with the addition of the "or any later version" clause.
>
> NO, I would rather not, please send me more email to convince me.
Yes, the relicensing is fine with me.
- Matthew Ogilvie
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+
[not found] <87k4sq8dt9.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
@ 2010-04-04 18:28 ` Fredrik Kuivinen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Fredrik Kuivinen @ 2010-04-04 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git; +Cc: Michal Sojka
Hi Michal,
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:21, Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> wrote:
> We would like to extend the license of that file from GPLv2 only
> license to GPLv2+ by adding the recommended "or any later version"
> clause to the license. This will give us license compatibility with
> GPLv3 projects, which would like to reuse test-lib.sh.
YES, I agree to relicense all my contributions to test-lib.sh to
GPLv2+ with the addition of the "or any later version" clause.
- Fredrik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+
2010-04-02 7:29 ` Git: relicensing test-lib.sh " Michal Sojka
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-04 17:41 ` Matthew Ogilvie
@ 2010-04-05 12:16 ` Gerrit Pape
2010-04-05 14:57 ` Pavel Roskin
2010-04-05 19:57 ` Emil Sit
16 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Gerrit Pape @ 2010-04-05 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Sojka; +Cc: git
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 09:29:11AM +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> We would like to extend the license of that file from GPLv2 only
> license to GPLv2+ by adding the recommended "or any later version"
> clause to the license. This will give us license compatibility with
> GPLv3 projects, which would like to reuse test-lib.sh.
YES, I agree to relicense all my contributions to test-lib.sh to GPLv2+
with the addition of the "or any later version" clause.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+
2010-04-02 7:29 ` Git: relicensing test-lib.sh " Michal Sojka
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-05 12:16 ` Gerrit Pape
@ 2010-04-05 14:57 ` Pavel Roskin
2010-04-05 19:57 ` Emil Sit
16 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Roskin @ 2010-04-05 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Sojka; +Cc: git
> YES, I agree to relicense all my contributions to test-lib.sh to GPLv2+
> with the addition of the "or any later version" clause.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
* Re: Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+
2010-04-02 7:29 ` Git: relicensing test-lib.sh " Michal Sojka
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-05 14:57 ` Pavel Roskin
@ 2010-04-05 19:57 ` Emil Sit
16 siblings, 0 replies; 25+ messages in thread
From: Emil Sit @ 2010-04-05 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Sojka, git
YES, I agree to relicense all my contributions to test-lib.sh to GPLv2+
with the addition of the "or any later version" clause.
--
Emil Sit / http://www.emilsit.net/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 25+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-05 19:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <87k4sq8dt9.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
2010-04-04 18:28 ` Git: relicensing test-lib.sh from GPLv2 to GPLv2+ Fredrik Kuivinen
[not found] <87ljf8pvxx.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
[not found] ` <87hbpwpoko.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
[not found] ` <5641883d1002060727ia4e6c16lf800a92fc8735430@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <201002081614.24284.sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>
[not found] ` <871vgr78lr.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
[not found] ` <87iqa2y0gz.fsf@steelpick.localdomain>
[not found] ` <87r5oqe7mi.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
2010-02-15 8:39 ` Using test-lib.sh under GPLv3? Michal Sojka
2010-02-16 20:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-02-19 8:19 ` Michal Sojka
2010-02-19 10:39 ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-02-19 19:01 ` Carl Worth
2010-02-19 21:04 ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-02-20 19:55 ` [PATCH] test-lib.sh: Add explicit license detail, with change from GPLv2 to GPLv2+ Carl Worth
2010-02-20 22:22 ` Johannes Schindelin
2010-04-02 7:29 ` Git: relicensing test-lib.sh " Michal Sojka
2010-04-02 7:43 ` Jonathan Nieder
2010-04-02 7:43 ` Petr Baudis
2010-04-02 7:51 ` Michal Sojka
2010-04-02 8:10 ` Petr Baudis
2010-04-02 8:27 ` Michal Sojka
2010-04-02 16:54 ` Jeff King
2010-04-02 8:59 ` Clemens Buchacher
2010-04-02 17:19 ` Johan Herland
2010-04-02 8:00 ` Matthias Lederhofer
2010-04-02 8:08 ` Lea Wiemann
2010-04-02 8:13 ` Michele Ballabio
2010-04-02 8:52 ` Clemens Buchacher
2010-04-02 11:43 ` Miklos Vajna
2010-04-02 15:51 ` Alex Riesen
2010-04-02 16:31 ` David Reiss
2010-04-02 16:43 ` Christian Couder
2010-04-02 20:38 ` Jakub Narebski
2010-04-04 11:56 ` Robin Rosenberg
2010-04-04 13:11 ` Michael J Gruber
2010-04-04 17:41 ` Matthew Ogilvie
2010-04-05 12:16 ` Gerrit Pape
2010-04-05 14:57 ` Pavel Roskin
2010-04-05 19:57 ` Emil Sit
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).