From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [RFC] Patches exchange is bad? Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:41:06 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20050818133411.15529.qmail@web26306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Aug 18 15:43:05 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E5ken-0007FO-Bg for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 15:42:09 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932226AbVHRNlv (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:41:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932227AbVHRNlv (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:41:51 -0400 Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com ([193.131.176.58]:32206 "EHLO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932226AbVHRNlv (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:41:51 -0400 Received: from cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.127.39]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j7IDekOU028186; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:40:46 +0100 (BST) Received: from ZIPPY.Emea.Arm.com (cam-exch2.emea.arm.com [10.1.255.58]) by cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA26743; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:41:39 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([10.1.69.144]) by ZIPPY.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:41:38 +0100 To: Marco Costalba In-Reply-To: <20050818133411.15529.qmail@web26306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> (Marco Costalba's message of "Thu, 18 Aug 2005 06:34:10 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Aug 2005 13:41:39.0024 (UTC) FILETIME=[8F3D5500:01C5A3FA] Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Marco Costalba wrote: > I was thinking at two different kind of workflow, one were you are > tracking a remote repository ( Linux kernel project like ) and one > as single developer with both stable and develop lines ( qgit or > StGIT ;-) projects like ). There is another option for the 2nd case, where you maintain both both stable and development. You could use 'git push' to the stable repository (actually, more like a mirror) and make the StGIT-maintained repository track the changes from the stable one and just update it with 'stg pull' -- Catalin