From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bradley Wagner Subject: Multiple SVN remote branches listed in "git branch -r" after "git-svn fetch" Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:59:23 -0400 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Jonathan Wage , Chap Lovejoy To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Apr 30 21:00:31 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7vRt-0001JZ-PV for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 21:00:30 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758909Ab0D3S7c (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:59:32 -0400 Received: from mail-pw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:52266 "EHLO mail-pw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933143Ab0D3S7Y (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:59:24 -0400 Received: by mail-pw0-f46.google.com with SMTP id 9so336019pwj.19 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:59:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.132.31 with SMTP id j31mr3053927wan.114.1272653963781; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:59:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.159.7 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:59:23 -0700 (PDT) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: So I did a conversion to Git using git-svn. git init # updated the .git/config file to reference a few different locations for branches: [svn-remote "svn"] url = fetch = cascade/trunk:refs/remotes/trunk branches = cascade/branches/{hibernate-upgrade,spring-upgrade}}:refs/remotes/* branches = cascade/branches/{6.x,5.x,4.x,3.x}/*:refs/remotes/* tags = cascade/tags/{3.7.x,4.x,5.x,6.x,old-releases}/*:refs/remotes/tags/* git svn fetch Now, I'm seeing branches/tags listed multiple times with: git branch -r 6.x/6.0.2.1 6.x/6.0.2.1@12401 6.x/6.0.2.1@12422 .... tags/4.x/rel_4_22 tags/4.x/rel_4_22@4093 tags/4.x/rel_4_22@4384 What do these other branches with the @ sign mean? Did I do something wrong? Thanks, Bradley