From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthieu Moy Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] rebase -i: add run command to launch a shell command Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:04:24 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1280323784-27462-1-git-send-email-Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Santi =?iso-8859-1?Q?B=E9jar?= X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jul 30 12:09:21 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OemWj-0001qH-Ft for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:09:17 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755895Ab0G3KJK convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:09:10 -0400 Received: from imag.imag.fr ([129.88.30.1]:52400 "EHLO imag.imag.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753340Ab0G3KJI (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:09:08 -0400 Received: from mail-veri.imag.fr (mail-veri.imag.fr [129.88.43.52]) by imag.imag.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6UA4P8x000675 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:04:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bauges.imag.fr ([129.88.43.5]) by mail-veri.imag.fr with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OemS0-0002Zh-U0; Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:04:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Matthieu Moy's message of "Wed\, 28 Jul 2010 16\:26\:54 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (imag.imag.fr [129.88.30.1]); Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:04:25 +0200 (CEST) X-IMAG-MailScanner-Information: Please contact MI2S MIM for more information X-IMAG-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-IMAG-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-IMAG-MailScanner-From: matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Matthieu Moy writes: > Santi B=E9jar writes: > >> $ git run HEAD^4.. command arguments >> >> (I'm not quite sure about the syntax). Something like "git bisect ru= n" >> but for all the commits in the range. >> >> I know you said "given points in history", maybe each approach is >> useful for each use case. > > Yes, I think both approaches make sense. I started playing with the patch, and I'm already starting to love it ;-). For example pick fixup run make pick pick =2E.. Just does "the right thing": it checks that the fixup doesn't break the commit (which is really not only a new state, but also a new patch, so it can really break), but doesn't spend too much time re-checking and (which are new states, but much more trustworthy than the fixup since the patches are really the same. I may check them later, but don't want to lose time with them while hacking). --=20 Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/