From: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, "Sebastian Pipping" <webmaster@hartwork.org>,
"SZEDER Gábor" <szeder@ira.uka.de>, "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1.8.0] add: make "add -u" update full tree without pathspec
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 15:53:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vpqipw2rixy.fsf@bauges.imag.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vk4gkk5pd.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Sun, 27 Feb 2011 22:56:30 -0800")
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> I already do not like the possibility of potential double deprecation
> myself, one to flip the default and then possibly another to drop the
> support of the traditional behavour, but anything I've seen so far would
> hurt the end users more than that plan.
I think promoting "git add -u ." more than a configuration option would
reduce the pain.
As a user, if I get used to typing "git add -u ." instead of "git add -u",
I get the current behavior regardless of the version of Git, without a
warning. Later, when all the machines I word on support the tree-wide
"git add -u" (either 1.7.x + some configuration or 1.8.y), I'll use it
as a new feature.
So, a warning like
warning: the behavior of "git add -u" without pathspec will change in
Git 1.8.0. To keep the current behavior, use this instead:
git add -u .
+ explanations about the config options as already discussed here
would be fine.
--
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-01 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-07 2:27 [PATCH 1.8.0] add: make "add -u" update full tree without pathspec Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2011-02-07 5:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-07 6:14 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-02-07 6:26 ` Miles Bader
2011-02-09 10:58 ` Joshua Juran
2011-02-07 12:09 ` Matthieu Moy
2011-02-27 10:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-27 11:43 ` Matthieu Moy
2011-02-27 17:04 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-02-27 13:35 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2011-02-27 17:01 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-02-27 16:52 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-02-27 19:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-28 6:37 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-02-28 6:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-03-01 11:22 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-03-01 13:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-03-01 14:15 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-03-01 14:53 ` Matthieu Moy [this message]
2011-03-01 18:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-03-01 18:51 ` Matthieu Moy
2011-03-01 19:36 ` Jakub Narebski
2011-03-01 20:00 ` Jeff King
2011-03-01 20:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-03-01 20:25 ` Matthieu Moy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=vpqipw2rixy.fsf@bauges.imag.fr \
--to=matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=szeder@ira.uka.de \
--cc=webmaster@hartwork.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).