From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavan Kumar Sunkara Subject: Re: GSoC 2010: "Integrated Web Client for git" proposal Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:12:01 +0530 Message-ID: References: <201004150630.44300.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> <201004202014.19477.jnareb@gmail.com> <201004230727.52212.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Jakub Narebski , Petr Baudis , git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano , Sverre Rabbelier , Shawn O Pearce , Scott Chacon , Sam Vilain To: Christian Couder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Apr 23 07:42:15 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O5BeY-0001kB-Tk for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:42:15 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755847Ab0DWFmH convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Apr 2010 01:42:07 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f194.google.com ([209.85.211.194]:40345 "EHLO mail-yw0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755799Ab0DWFmE convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Apr 2010 01:42:04 -0400 Received: by ywh32 with SMTP id 32so5411059ywh.33 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:42:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=JycekSsJ3lb+64QY4sJwlOVf7DzQoDZti0TiuYDWf/8=; b=fpSdU3/AQaY7EIK/IIJckweERgcUC6a9oB/6/7+HjdCcLD54YpLj577epMFx/SnCM+ ghYsmCZqZABsO+6gqN0zOG4C6eb2FerGBcNDGQl65flaP7fuwfIJkaSV/gZcpQzHfgS2 3IVi4v+inX5dpLW8EHagwjridZA7XyMHrHSDA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=GsAu/n7VaT+gdzkTUCnc0Aw9sOegIbPaFg0W1au6uG0FVomN51GkhcS6zXDnbgTNwd 38maNVctWfHO0Tk8XgCzJO6MB2nG149yPbG2JetjJdtIRGYGKcqcB/iVZB3dyoRDyYjU kiDp375jiUgp9Lt5RhLZDzxecrXxdXFlDgrIc= Received: by 10.90.99.11 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:42:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201004230727.52212.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Received: by 10.91.146.20 with SMTP id y20mr5663254agn.19.1272001321935; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 22:42:01 -0700 (PDT) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Christian Couder wrote: > On Wednesday 21 April 2010 22:49:02 Pavan Kumar Sunkara wrote: >> 1.What is the goal of your project? >> The project goal is to try and implement write functionalities into = gitweb >> to go along with it's browsing functionalities. Another goal is to s= plit >> gitweb Perl script and reorganize its structure. I would like to spl= it the >> gitweb script in such a way that, in the future others will be able = to >> develop more functionalities for gitweb (let it be 'read' or 'write' >> actions) with the help of the framework like structure of the new gi= tweb. >> >> 'read' means browsing through the code and repository >> 'write' means working on the code and repository. >> >> I will be describing about them detailedly in the later parts of the >> proposal. > > Perhaps this sentence could be worded like this: > > "I will describe in detail the read and write actions in the later pa= rt of the > proposal." > >> 2.How would you measure its success or failure? >> There are two parameters which would majorly determine the success o= r >> failure of the project. >> >> =A0 =A0* Splitting gitweb such that there should be no problem with = the >> installation of gitweb across cross servers and cross systems. >> =A0 =A0* Working with new addition to gitweb should be as easy as wo= rking with >> other git GUIs (git commit tools) >> =A0 =A0* User friendly graphical interface with smart UI design >> >> 3.Describe your project in more detail. >> I would like to split the currently 6800 long piece of code in >> gitweb.plperl script into small files which will result in better >> readability, >> maintainability and modifiability. The file structure of the new git= web is >> given below and I will explain the working after it. >> >> (From now on, I would like to call the actions of gitweb as modules = of >> gitweb) > > Perhaps it would be better to state that in the end each action will = have its > own Perl module. Thanks. As I said before, Sorry for my grammar. > Though I agree with Petr that first you should probably just shuffle = around all > the utility routines in one module and develop write actions in anoth= er module > that uses the first one. > > Thanks, > Christian. > > Yeah, I am planning to do that. :-) Thanks -pavan