From: Eugene Sajine <euguess@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] - git rebase -i performs rebase when it shouldn't?
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:28:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <w2t76c5b8581004120828p8e1e5c49m7bcc53c8c3e68d06@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BC3389C.4090807@viscovery.net>
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net> wrote:
> Am 4/12/2010 16:09, schrieb Eugene Sajine:
>> esajine@ESAJINEWWW /c/git_repos/test2 (topic)
>> $ git rebase master
>> Current branch topic is up to date.
>> <======= Really? Topic is actually based on next – what does this "up
>> to date" mean??
>
> Why should rebase bother? The difference between master and topic are
> *two* commits. Since these two are already on top of master in linear
> history, you get no advantage by doing a rebase operation. Therefore, you
> see "already up to date".
You lost me completely...
Rebase means change the base of the commit, change the fork point.
Current fork point for topic is next. I want it to be master. What is
up to date here???
The message is poorly worded for sure.
I know that the form i have to use is:
git rebase --onto master next topic
but it is just because topic is not direct descendant of master, isn't it?
>
>> esajine@ESAJINEWWW /c/git_repos/test2 (topic)
>> $ git rebase -i --onto master topic
>> Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/topic. <=== BUG – here it
>> printed me “noop” in file to edit, when I exited it should do nothing,
>> but it still did something and I double checked it.
>
> Not a bug.
>
> Your command is the same as
>
> git rebase -i --onto master topic topic
>
> because you are already on branch topic. Since there are no commits in the
> range topic..topic, rebase -i told you "noop". This word is perhaps poorly
> chosen, because it does not mean "no operation"[*], but "there are no
> commits to transfer". But branch 'topic' that you gave as the last
> argument (or implicitly by being at branch 'topic') is still transferred
> --onto master. This explains the result that you observed.
>
> Of course, if you do not 'reset --hard topic@{1}' at this point, you will
> ultimately lose the commits on branch topic.
>
> [*] You can get "no operation" by deleting the line "noop".
>
> -- Hannes
>
Come on! Please, please, explain me why it behaves DIFFERENTLY:
esajine@ESAJINEWWW /c/git_repos/test2 (topic)
$ git rebase --onto master topic
First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it...
fatal: Not a range.
Nothing to do.
<======== topic..HEAD is not a range, agreed
esajine@ESAJINEWWW /c/git_repos/test2 (topic)
$ git rebase -i --onto master topic
Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/topic. <=== BUG – here it
printed me “noop” in file to edit, when I exited it should do nothing,
but it still did something and I double checked it.
Thanks,
Eugene
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-12 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-09 19:35 [BUG] - git rebase -i performs rebase when it shouldn't? Eugene Sajine
2010-04-10 4:26 ` Jeff King
2010-04-10 4:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-04-10 4:47 ` Jeff King
2010-04-10 19:58 ` Johannes Sixt
2010-04-11 10:15 ` Jeff King
2010-04-11 17:54 ` Johannes Sixt
2010-04-12 1:01 ` Jeff King
2010-04-12 10:50 ` Michal Vitecek
2010-04-12 17:39 ` Johannes Sixt
2010-04-10 22:10 ` Eugene Sajine
2010-04-11 10:22 ` Jeff King
2010-04-11 14:06 ` Eugene Sajine
2010-04-12 14:09 ` Eugene Sajine
2010-04-12 15:13 ` Johannes Sixt
2010-04-12 15:28 ` Eugene Sajine [this message]
2010-04-12 15:47 ` Johannes Sixt
2010-04-13 16:30 ` Eugene Sajine
2010-04-14 6:08 ` Johannes Sixt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=w2t76c5b8581004120828p8e1e5c49m7bcc53c8c3e68d06@mail.gmail.com \
--to=euguess@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).