From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INVALID_MSGID, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,MSGID_NOFQDN1,PLING_QUERY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: (qmail 32212 invoked by uid 111); 24 Jun 2008 03:26:07 -0000 Received: from vger.kernel.org (HELO vger.kernel.org) (209.132.176.167) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.32) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:25:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752522AbYFXDZy (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:25:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752884AbYFXDZy (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:25:54 -0400 Received: from w2.willowmail.com ([64.243.175.54]:59983 "HELO w2.willowmail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752245AbYFXDZy (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:25:54 -0400 Received: (qmail 7236 invoked by uid 90); 24 Jun 2008 03:25:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "David Jeske" To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: why is git destructive by default? (i suggest it not be!) X-Mailer: Willow v0.02 Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 03:18:45 -0000 Message-ID: Received: from 67.188.42.104 at Tue, 24 Jun 2008 03:18:45 -0000 References: In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org -- Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> or we expect "running without ever collecting the log" >> to be a valid mode of operation... which I doubt is the case. > > Why not? Is see the hole I left in my logic, so let me restate. ... or we expect "human parsing of the the log" is a valid common user-interface for non-git developers.