From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-b2-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-b2-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7E694C041A for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 14:18:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.145 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785334719; cv=none; b=Vv4E7lyYh06lHCT1jmU/SWD/usuDvaPFs5qgH31aHh3RpwfTBHk+EIenpn/tb3R6GSMI71evunCDPY3TvoT9mmJ+H+bI3RrFDx++VpMmGPZG8VNBXroQCSIkndhYR7yBP01q9bIAL1eBTh6UjAFIeWpR6aFNmXUEwPDYWVk7aew= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785334719; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PhAAnV4oNYXtFSTmpb9GFfLcmPgDR5AmHFAznILzNA4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=g8r1+S/JVcX/68DzKWMqnHKDnGIYDkUct94uxsWOLLrNncbxAL1KhPG9bSclxeeJ01rcoRTWvRt22x7dciU0fuOuK5TAvEkh44viAF5SnVYt0Q7IkVWluqth8r3/m4bFlNGatxG8cFWOKyalKafwBe//jf/G7G5p1yG+eBz/3gI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=mbyptnCS; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=Xuh2M4Kl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.145 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="mbyptnCS"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="Xuh2M4Kl" Received: from phl-compute-06.internal (phl-compute-06.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2005F1D0013F; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 10:18:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-02 ([10.202.2.161]) by phl-compute-06.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 29 Jul 2026 10:18:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1785334716; x=1785421116; bh=4NAYt+ywMt ZEI0IqQB9hnQir1oG+trFeY530/UOFA7M=; b=mbyptnCSDwNxZX0HEXb1yL3bt7 UJT6dKXs6qweG4Z+2k/dv6UwmwgR3jsqHspyYCCLJ5bb8c7YtaXRL85xD+sfZfzB y+M9sqxwE03/QweTBd3T6wmhy+P3JH/S/a9fgtkBDBck6T/N0nxThDGZCLkURxF+ /UIQVF2C1NcEw2JUzf64sIXtdAhtxnDuHkhMY3bIW8MZeX5rSDe2oEEXLbOZiNO1 +aNnNMnPpFc9xR0XSD+40bT+3pfv4CIrVPbaYtlzgjqpJH09gSbPx0kQxhdTEhRI CCQyS8NXS4BrAmue0W+oZKLq3+S/6Zt61UwrE1fKaTBFPgBMIAEJrLsm1iNw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1785334716; x=1785421116; bh=4NAYt+ywMtZEI0IqQB9hnQir1oG+trFeY53 0/UOFA7M=; b=Xuh2M4Kl8oYENqeWMuteb1jdIa162HcFZz2nohCVIl+KyiYtzEl 0eCj6MGZPZwHfk/ZM7E9hG2T0qrlJsvLXf1V4j5naTLyuNpOSfO+wg7sVf72b0wZ hNMjN1+iBtQ3EbxSiuzqFt5CjcHw5JTeqr47q2PWCs8hSg5tQKW/LQrpc6TpDCdf Q79+AtOA2v+VaSKEKhy5uqc/EG2P/hhphabLcDghC6dPwxbst3K5giAoMDDpwF/5 rKOldRr/HpPMYRktxKMCgOuFf+Lsm2d8Uvt4tCtsFO+gwqIN7fD2RBkLsIrdqpLV Ygs1S8ewIn76Idzsb0HKDBHOSsmEU0Nn7Bw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: dmFkZTGcuCoTrAcmCxBo+aU9PYg/rzt090MVZ47pexlclevOQ1cQvNmGJoTfX+D+YEhmHj /VKFNmzOSaU5N/4sOAk2/OwcDnNQd1VHe0MZld+PlXxpMTzJTynOdiiJWNgGWfDzZoNuYm LooRWLDXH7iiLWpHT0P6nsxtecca0dLoldfQttqP+zO7nCVZ+BjZx0QVRcYomIIl94TRnZ aSCjn48dtLOf1UHwT2uPV0kd6ZaHwinGIlozn8yMbJnPadFfTWz9A+pEfKvvkTv1ln8Kik 9IlZqf16LG/M9RZ/r4QLOBD14YYP/DTKze+BfD8gaLJlObSE8PJhDD+cl1UKRa3kI3A7JO ig7wgMLABie2aGU3TsFSv/SScml6Pnyu1/uzY/Fh220Iom+42Wjw6lNjuiLWmh6aLlXgt+ 0j6pE6R6QUSnkOacF6ZVsIYjFHxav2wwN58K+PWTZ8vkFfDV26UffKQP/E98766qZKdyUq 07VVEh7tC4JR3xkacAikVwEJNDS21iJm2hRyE9kKYCq+Na0y1gTW5eXU3vadfoZIn66eLJ 1xRdfoDJl9IvxKY3G+J8VSF+be4Mm0dsLzv0P+62yCffe8a53/1etqzMP4J8a/Eh/3hAV9 ais75bLWQZGXY62m6lKhuRsugnziIWA0VL4rweiJtAUvDncDus7c5NR0S5hA X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 29 Jul 2026 10:18:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Phillip Wood Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Harald Nordgren Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jul 2026, #12) In-Reply-To: (Phillip Wood's message of "Wed, 29 Jul 2026 14:24:00 +0100") References: Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 07:18:35 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Phillip Wood writes: >> The experimental 'git history' command has been taught a new 'squash' >> subcommand to fold a range of commits into a single commit, with any >> descendants replayed on top. >> >> Will merge to 'master'. >> cf. >> cf. >> source: > > Oh, I'd missed this going into master. Has the implementation received > any serious review? I've seen messages from a couple of people trying it > out but I can't see anybody reading the code. Thanks for stopping me. I am happy to immediately revert the merge of this topic into 'next'. Perhaps I should re-evaluate the "What's Cooking" report and eject other topics from 'next' as well. There are indeed topics I did not personally read, relying instead on impressions from busy exchanges (including earlier iterations read by others X-<). Are there other topics in 'next' that do not deserve to be there yet? I cannot, of course, afford to be the sole serious reviewer and merge only those I have carefully read through, given that there are only 24 hours in a day and I have other obligations. So either our quality criteria must suffer, like this episode showed us, or more topics must be ignored. > Having a quick look > through it assumes the presence of an UNINTERESTING commit means we have > a BOTTOM commit. It then assumes that UNINTERESTING commit means we > cannot reach any root commits. Both of those assumptions are false I > think. Very true. > ... I'll try and go through the patches and produce some fixups, > though that may not be until next week. Thanks.