From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Han Jiang <jhcarl0814@gmail.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: `git config get --type=path` results in segmentation fault on value starting with `:(optional)`
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 08:46:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq1pls8xeu.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251120075019.GA1283645@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu, 20 Nov 2025 02:50:19 -0500")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Thanks for analysing all of the above (omitted); I was doing the
same on the bus but couldn't finish it and then when I reached the
office, you've nicely done everything necessary ;-)
> I put a [*] above on "more or less does the right thing" because there's
> another corner case, even for callers like commit.template. What should
> this:
>
> [commit]
> template = :(optional)does-exist
> template = :(optional)does-not-exist
>
> With the current code, we will ignore the second config entry entirely,
> and the result will point to "does-exist". But that feels surprising to
> me.
The documentation says
If prefixed with :(optional), the configuration variable is
treated as if it does not exist, if the named path does not
exist.
and when I wrote it, by "the configuration variable", I meant the
second "template = ..." line above, not the configuration variable
commit.template, that the machinery pretends not to exist. So the
result pointing at does-exist matches my expectation.
> I kind of wonder if git_config_pathname() ought to be returning more
> data to the caller, like:
>
> struct config_pathname {
> char *path; /* never NULL */
> unsigned missing : 1;
> };
>
> That would change the interface of git_config_pathname(), but that would
> also force us to make the appropriate changes in each caller.
The problem is that there is no mechanism for the function to say
"success" without setting *dest to the discovered value. We could
introduce multiple kinds of "failure", and have callers react to the
differences, but then it is like setting NULL in *dest and having
callers react to it, so I am not sure how much benefit we would be
gaining by changing its interface.
On the other hand, builtin/config.c::format_config() probably needs
a richer set of return values. When used from collect_config(), it
needs to be able to say "no, pretend that the key/value pair you fed
me did not exist" in addition to "that value is bogus---you have an
error (e.g., config_error_nonbool())".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-20 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-20 6:46 `git config get --type=path` results in segmentation fault on value starting with `:(optional)` Han Jiang
2025-11-20 7:50 ` Jeff King
2025-11-20 14:34 ` D. Ben Knoble
2025-11-20 16:46 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-11-25 0:28 ` Jeff King
2025-11-25 0:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-26 15:13 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq1pls8xeu.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jhcarl0814@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).