git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] odb: track commit graphs via object source
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2025 16:27:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq1pol7q8i.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250904-b4-pks-commit-graph-via-source-v1-0-d932c2481e1a@pks.im> (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Thu, 04 Sep 2025 14:49:54 +0200")

Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:

> There's a trivial conflict with tc/last-modified that can be solved like
> this:
>
> diff --cc commit-graph.c
> index 9929c1ed87,2f20f66cfd..0000000000
> --- a/commit-graph.c
> +++ b/commit-graph.c
> @@@ -823,7 -812,12 +823,11 @@@ int corrected_commit_dates_enabled(stru
>   
>   struct bloom_filter_settings *get_bloom_filter_settings(struct repository *r)
>   {
>  -	struct commit_graph *g;
>  +	struct commit_graph *g = prepare_commit_graph(r);
> + 
>  -	if (!prepare_commit_graph(r))
> ++	if (!g)
> + 	       return NULL;
> + 

The while (g) loop will be entirely skipped when g==NULL, and then
the function returns NULL after iterating the loop, so there is not
much reason to have these three lines for early-return, no?

>  -	g = r->objects->commit_graph;
>   	while (g) {
>   		if (g->bloom_filter_settings)
>   			return g->bloom_filter_settings;

Thanks.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-04 23:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-04 12:49 [PATCH 0/6] odb: track commit graphs via object source Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 1/6] blame: drop explicit check for commit graph Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-11 22:09   ` Taylor Blau
2025-09-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 2/6] revision: " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-11 22:16   ` Taylor Blau
2025-09-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 3/6] commit-graph: return the prepared commit graph from `prepare_commit_graph()` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-11 22:25   ` Taylor Blau
2025-09-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 4/6] commit-graph: return commit graph from `repo_find_commit_pos_in_graph()` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-11 22:54   ` Taylor Blau
2025-09-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 5/6] commit-graph: pass graphs that are to be merged as parameter Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-04 12:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] odb: move commit-graph into the object sources Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-11 23:00   ` Taylor Blau
2025-09-04 23:12 ` [PATCH 0/6] odb: track commit graphs via object source Junio C Hamano
2025-09-05 18:29   ` Derrick Stolee
2025-09-08 11:17     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-08 14:46       ` Derrick Stolee
2025-09-10 11:38         ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-25 19:17           ` Junio C Hamano
2025-09-26  5:18             ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-02 11:21             ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-02 11:35               ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-02 16:49               ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-03 16:56                 ` Derrick Stolee
2025-09-11 23:08       ` Taylor Blau
2025-09-04 23:27 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-09-05  6:18   ` Patrick Steinhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq1pol7q8i.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).