From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-a2-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a2-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B83A1D5CD4 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2025 17:18:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.145 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741886283; cv=none; b=YnHDM4f1CWNv0SMucLUCKBVEl1oSFohMOk0IRhOelCcbIJNzYE1ZkOGcGRdEpqzy8doPOdBcjsflNsv+66KC6lxNmA/oycMgT25yEskIYgoO8Jc+fNxEP1w73xMQI0Tu7XmckTC1HVWpbarllCLAI7VaIi+EtmcFeb5Aje5tqHo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741886283; c=relaxed/simple; bh=a5KKk5jbQRcZICRJ2iULXUIEXC8mOg2cc0u0p3dtyMk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=t9Byc1Jgf4kZnmjytbIPyBntwwaW5Ugi0r3zxThRO1mOPt3ixiVfYdbpFoyGaDh2PQf1I/zgqKgZwoXK46imVc6v3LKxBW593zI254VYQD9NMevI5yKrqczPjisRdgC7pID3QwCn/BSVTDTBW1LZchHqO1BO9BQ5vNzQR70LzLU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=rWuXTx1L; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=GJ55AYlf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.145 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="rWuXTx1L"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="GJ55AYlf" Received: from phl-compute-07.internal (phl-compute-07.phl.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 736FA138315B; Thu, 13 Mar 2025 13:18:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-07.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 13 Mar 2025 13:18:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1741886280; x=1741972680; bh=7DhuJLUcXo 2LbhIUR3cRPYaP7wnT3SIdiRlMgNHW9r8=; b=rWuXTx1La6kTGfr+DqY81K21Zy IvD0ryA3831PjMGnN4O3hDddaa/YOKIpWtenw0OTWWgEoTWHZwd8tO2zmhSRoGGv tHcBLFjJbFkSBjb3nCHG51gahJEfW9B9t8mrIaKRni7M8I/pCRLdAE/vmHtfUmc/ CbWucXLlL5T9l6xP+G8SxK1xwcR7cFU+Z9XtmXmqOmo6Y5YutEiCkAsIRB9cjOM2 KXwK5lHm+HTwC5TOPS+EVAhZim/Py9xXwt8u8APVCQNQ7vHANzsBNQlh91jOZcAh b127D80SporwZn4whCbD5cXUtFpGXLfxMUNi0cIXMk98X7bHWmSGxbIE2W0Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1741886280; x=1741972680; bh=7DhuJLUcXo2LbhIUR3cRPYaP7wnT3SIdiRl MgNHW9r8=; b=GJ55AYlfgVxajr97aykCdJxZsePEeF+1EurNVV8WELJrEIDO13f /jlOkev3Vlz0sYWQS6thL7tiwUcebk5bbNUWuxfpwiFm4lNynRE4NpcptNTMLLoW mxy6O7yyBmG0uQNxackBCQ4HAhW7VoQ2zS1VYOhtD3mIlZbkO2I9lXegyK7nlxQO Y0ggVhkfsoFwVNn/GcbdVrUC08JsYqYBA6pBZd0f2avv92f6Mg0Am4z9wwVcLfIa 3A32fvfohLqj63/wWfnIngh8g6Oqigc8703r1PHe5nMLHR/OqKlyxU/VFhaUx9iv tWcJ6UNFzNxr2UMYxv7WRFUhQP2z8H3DdlQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgdduvdekheefucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggv pdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpih gvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgesthdtredttder tdenucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcuvecujfgrmhgrnhhouceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosg hogidrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepfeevteetjeehueegffelvdetieevffeu feejleeuffetiefggfeftdfhfeeigeeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrg hrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomhdpnhgspghr tghpthhtohepiedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepmhgvsehtthgrhi hlohhrrhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhg pdhrtghpthhtohepphgvfhhfsehpvghffhdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhopehnvgifrhgvnh esghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehpshesphhkshdrihhmpdhrtghpthhtohep ghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 13 Mar 2025 13:17:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Taylor Blau Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , Elijah Newren , Patrick Steinhardt Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] pack-objects: freshen objects with multi-cruft packs In-Reply-To: (Taylor Blau's message of "Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:52:25 -0400") References: Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 10:17:57 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Taylor Blau writes: > Perhaps in the longer term, but I think for the reasons above that the > existing behavior (plus the new patch from v3, which we should still > queue) is sufficient. The older iteration has a few loose ends we would want to tie. Elijah's "decision to combine should be made at half or below the max size to always make a progress" would also makes sense. Thanks.