From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "John Cai via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, John Cai <johncai86@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] index-pack: test and document --strict=<msg>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 10:03:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq1qa4nf9i.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3b3e8bd0bf2c83b57debef81edc39970beaf05b.1706289180.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (John Cai via GitGitGadget's message of "Fri, 26 Jan 2024 17:12:59 +0000")
"John Cai via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
> From: John Cai <johncai86@gmail.com>
>
> 5d477a334a (fsck (receive-pack): allow demoting errors to warnings,
> 2015-06-22) allowed a list of fsck msg to downgrade to be passed to
> --strict. However this is a hidden argument that was not documented nor
> tested. Though it is true that most users would not call this option
> directly, (nor use index-pack for that matter) it is still useful to
> document and test this feature.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Cai <johncai86@gmail.com>
> ---
> Documentation/git-index-pack.txt | 9 +++++++--
> builtin/index-pack.c | 2 +-
> t/t5300-pack-object.sh | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-index-pack.txt b/Documentation/git-index-pack.txt
> index 6486620c3d8..f7a98bbf9c8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-index-pack.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-index-pack.txt
> @@ -79,8 +79,13 @@ OPTIONS
> to force the version for the generated pack index, and to force
> 64-bit index entries on objects located above the given offset.
>
> ---strict::
> - Die, if the pack contains broken objects or links.
> +--strict[=<msg-id>=<severity>...]::
> + Die, if the pack contains broken objects or links. If `<msg-ids>` is passed,
> + it should be a comma-separated list of `<msg-id>=<severity>` elements where
> + `<msg-id>` and `<severity>` are used to change the severity of some possible
> + issues, e.g., `--strict="missingEmail=ignore,badTagName=error"`. See the entry
There no longer is <msg-ids>, so I'll tweak the text perhaps like so:
An optional value that is a comma-separated list of '<msg-id>=<severity>'
can be passed to change the severity of some possible issues, ...
while queueing. Will probably do the same for the --fsck-objects
side in the next patch.
Other than that, thanks for a pleasant read.
> + for the `fsck.<msg-id>` configuration options in `linkgit:git-fsck[1] for
> + more information on the possible values of `<msg-id>` and `<severity>`.
>
> --progress-title::
> For internal use only.
> diff --git a/builtin/index-pack.c b/builtin/index-pack.c
> index 1ea87e01f29..1e53ca23775 100644
> --- a/builtin/index-pack.c
> +++ b/builtin/index-pack.c
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
> #include "setup.h"
>
> static const char index_pack_usage[] =
> -"git index-pack [-v] [-o <index-file>] [--keep | --keep=<msg>] [--[no-]rev-index] [--verify] [--strict] (<pack-file> | --stdin [--fix-thin] [<pack-file>])";
> +"git index-pack [-v] [-o <index-file>] [--keep | --keep=<msg>] [--[no-]rev-index] [--verify] [--strict[=<msg-ids>]] (<pack-file> | --stdin [--fix-thin] [<pack-file>])";
>
> struct object_entry {
> struct pack_idx_entry idx;
> diff --git a/t/t5300-pack-object.sh b/t/t5300-pack-object.sh
> index d402ec18b79..496fffa0f8a 100755
> --- a/t/t5300-pack-object.sh
> +++ b/t/t5300-pack-object.sh
> @@ -441,6 +441,28 @@ test_expect_success 'index-pack with --strict' '
> )
> '
>
> +test_expect_success 'index-pack with --strict downgrading fsck msgs' '
> + test_when_finished rm -rf strict &&
> + git init strict &&
> + (
> + cd strict &&
> + test_commit first hello &&
> + cat >commit <<-EOF &&
> + tree $(git rev-parse HEAD^{tree})
> + parent $(git rev-parse HEAD)
> + author A U Thor
> + committer A U Thor
> +
> + commit: this is a commit with bad emails
> +
> + EOF
> + git hash-object --literally -t commit -w --stdin <commit >commit_list &&
> + PACK=$(git pack-objects test <commit_list) &&
> + test_must_fail git index-pack --strict "test-$PACK.pack" &&
> + git index-pack --strict="missingEmail=ignore" "test-$PACK.pack"
> + )
> +'
> +
> test_expect_success 'honor pack.packSizeLimit' '
> git config pack.packSizeLimit 3m &&
> packname_10=$(git pack-objects test-10 <obj-list) &&
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-26 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-25 20:51 [PATCH 0/2] index-pack: fsck honor checks John Cai via GitGitGadget
2024-01-25 20:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] index-pack: test and document --strict=<msg> John Cai via GitGitGadget
2024-01-25 22:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-25 20:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] index-pack: --fsck-objects to take an optional argument for fsck msgs John Cai via GitGitGadget
2024-01-25 23:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-26 17:12 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] index-pack: fsck honor checks John Cai via GitGitGadget
2024-01-26 17:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] index-pack: test and document --strict=<msg> John Cai via GitGitGadget
2024-01-26 18:03 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-01-26 17:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] index-pack: --fsck-objects to take an optional argument for fsck msgs John Cai via GitGitGadget
2024-01-26 18:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-26 20:18 ` John Cai
2024-01-26 20:59 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] index-pack: fsck honor checks John Cai via GitGitGadget
2024-01-26 20:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] index-pack: test and document --strict=<msg-id>=<severity> John Cai via GitGitGadget
2024-01-26 20:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] index-pack: --fsck-objects to take an optional argument for fsck msgs John Cai via GitGitGadget
2024-01-26 21:18 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] index-pack: fsck honor checks Junio C Hamano
2024-01-26 22:11 ` John Cai
2024-01-29 11:15 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-29 17:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-26 22:13 ` Jonathan Tan
2024-01-27 2:31 ` John Cai
2024-01-31 22:30 ` Jonathan Tan
2024-02-01 1:34 ` John Cai
2024-02-01 16:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-01 1:38 ` [PATCH v4 " John Cai via GitGitGadget
2024-02-01 1:38 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] index-pack: test and document --strict=<msg-id>=<severity> John Cai via GitGitGadget
2024-02-01 1:38 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] index-pack: --fsck-objects to take an optional argument for fsck msgs John Cai via GitGitGadget
2024-03-08 22:24 ` SZEDER Gábor
2024-03-09 1:55 ` John Cai
2024-02-02 15:48 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] index-pack: fsck honor checks Christian Couder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq1qa4nf9i.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=johncai86@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).