From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "John Cai via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, John Cai <johncai86@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] receive-pack.c: consolidate find header logic
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 15:01:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq1r1tofyf.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.1125.v2.git.git.1640758765723.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (John Cai via GitGitGadget's message of "Wed, 29 Dec 2021 06:19:25 +0000")
"John Cai via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
> From: John Cai <johncai86@gmail.com>
>
> There are two functions that have very similar logic of finding a header
> value. find_commit_header, and find_header. We can conslidate the logic
> by using find_commit_header and replacing the logic in find_header.
>
> Introduce a new function find_header_max, which is equivalent to
> find_commit_header except it takes a len parameter that determines how
> many bytes to read. find_commit_header can then call find_header_max
> with 0 as the len.
find_header_max() is not the name of the function that finds the
largest header? That is misleading.
<git-compat-util.h> defines a few helper functions that take a
counted string, and they are named with _mem() suffix after the name
of their NUL-terminated counterparts (if exists). skip_prefix() has
skip_prefix_mem(), strip_suffix() has strip_suffix_mem().
find_header_mem() or something along that line, perhaps?
> diff --git a/commit.c b/commit.c
> index a348f085b2b..2ed115e04a0 100644
> --- a/commit.c
> +++ b/commit.c
> @@ -1631,12 +1631,14 @@ struct commit_list **commit_list_append(struct commit *commit,
> return &new_commit->next;
> }
>
> -const char *find_commit_header(const char *msg, const char *key, size_t *out_len)
> +const char *find_header_max(const char *msg, const char *key,
> + size_t len,
> + size_t *out_len)
If <len> is meant to be the length part of <ptr,len> pair, we should
have it immediately after the <ptr> parameter.
find_header_mem(const char *msg, size_t len,
const char *key, size_t *out_len)
That makes it clear to the readers that <msg, len> are close friends.
Also, I have a feeling that ...
> {
> int key_len = strlen(key);
> const char *line = msg;
>
> - while (line) {
> + while (line && (len == 0 || line < msg + len)) {
... we do not want this special casing of "if !len". By making the
caller responsible to _always_ supply the length of msg, we can lose
the conditional.
> const char *eol = strchrnul(line, '\n');
>
> if (line == eol)
> @@ -1653,6 +1655,10 @@ const char *find_commit_header(const char *msg, const char *key, size_t *out_len
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +const char *find_commit_header(const char *msg, const char *key, size_t *out_len)
> +{
> + return find_header_max(msg, key, 0, out_len);
I.e. find_header_mem(msg, strlen(msg), key, out_len);
> diff --git a/builtin/receive-pack.c b/builtin/receive-pack.c
> index 9f4a0b816cf..b69ead8dcda 100644
> --- a/builtin/receive-pack.c
> +++ b/builtin/receive-pack.c
> @@ -581,32 +581,19 @@ static char *prepare_push_cert_nonce(const char *path, timestamp_t stamp)
> return strbuf_detach(&buf, NULL);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * NEEDSWORK: reuse find_commit_header() from jk/commit-author-parsing
> - * after dropping "_commit" from its name and possibly moving it out
> - * of commit.c
> - */
> static char *find_header(const char *msg, size_t len, const char *key,
> const char **next_line)
> {
> + size_t out_len;
> + const char *val = find_header_max(msg, key, len, &out_len);
> +
> + if (val == NULL)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (next_line)
> + *next_line = val + out_len + 1;
> +
> + return xmemdupz(val, out_len);
> }
Yup, something along that line. Note that find_header() does make
it clear that the <msg, len> parameters form a pair. We want to do
the same for the new helper.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-30 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-27 18:26 [PATCH 0/2] Consolidate find_header logic into one function John Cai via GitGitGadget
2021-12-27 18:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] receive-pack.c: consolidate find header logic John Cai via GitGitGadget
2021-12-27 22:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-12-27 18:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] commit.c: rename find_commit_header to find_header John Cai via GitGitGadget
2021-12-29 6:19 ` [PATCH v2] receive-pack.c: consolidate find header logic John Cai via GitGitGadget
2021-12-30 23:01 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2021-12-31 6:17 ` [PATCH v3] " John Cai via GitGitGadget
2022-01-04 1:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-04 15:12 ` John Cai
2022-01-05 15:21 ` [PATCH v4] " John Cai via GitGitGadget
2022-01-05 20:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-06 0:51 ` [PATCH v5] " John Cai via GitGitGadget
2022-01-06 19:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-06 20:07 ` [PATCH v6] " John Cai via GitGitGadget
2022-01-08 4:54 ` John Cai
2022-01-08 7:11 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq1r1tofyf.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=johncai86@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).