From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA04C433F5 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 00:24:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230259AbhLRAYh (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2021 19:24:37 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:51297 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229604AbhLRAYg (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2021 19:24:36 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF761F9108; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 19:24:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=8w1mHbA1Me5A yrweB90RK5dsFXu5n8vQKBmE5pH8R7o=; b=sIbqtHhpSGeZoGSQsbV3JJSTWGGT xTz6+XHwGPWZj4NbRXDxm3X+1G6x03fFG4l336mpF0qx98QHSXsHWNRZlplAWMiN k3Eplc6u7zdwYG7pr8u+8Cnde9fHb4rbKlUXpXFRy4dzNYZ+La73QXGc3BRd5ota JkmQnSu7LztC4M0= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7007F9107; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 19:24:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.133.2.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D9C6F9105; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 19:24:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o?= Victor Bonfim Cc: Martin Fick , "brian m. carlson" , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Fw: Curiosity References: <54fe7ba20109f974b61a7e6c24ba8264@codeaurora.org> <1X3gQ48NK5aBDHcpYMlxESRjqubcCBKJUQu2K0dBOnTyvsXCXXoGDBg2Ff4KarK6WsZnzN3HgqHGOlCKKdF-wtZQ5tHsoAcfit2CTXMWqh4=@protonmail.com> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 16:24:33 -0800 In-Reply-To: <1X3gQ48NK5aBDHcpYMlxESRjqubcCBKJUQu2K0dBOnTyvsXCXXoGDBg2Ff4KarK6WsZnzN3HgqHGOlCKKdF-wtZQ5tHsoAcfit2CTXMWqh4=@protonmail.com> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Jo=C3=A3o?= Victor Bonfim"'s message of "Sat, 18 Dec 2021 00:15:59 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E0AC61C6-5F98-11EC-A8F8-CB998F0A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jo=C3=A3o Victor Bonfim writes: >> I suspect that for most algorithms and their implementations, this wou= ld >> >> not result in repeatable "recompressed" results. Thus the checked-out >> >> files might be different every time you checked them out. :( > > How or why? > > Sincere question. Two immediate things that come to my mind are lossy compression algorithms (jpeg pictures?) and compressors that do not necessarily produce bit-for-bit identical results (e.g. gzip by default embeds timestamp unless explicitly told not to from a command line option).