From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9549DC4363A for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 20:45:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3141A2237B for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 20:45:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="kOt5i1wG" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2505494AbgJUUpZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:45:25 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:52215 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2505489AbgJUUpY (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:45:24 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58AAE903FE; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:45:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=iPIBhQuOGX5Fy5WHJmSILesQ82U=; b=kOt5i1 wGr2iNJkhEvEjo1vHzdhZ3TsMo6smwV2bZJ5xUm299ROcoQTdZm5nZEAA8Yk41yt Yf8bg7ICbx1MMVJFhFYwEWdlL234I/MyF/M+LGL01l2JMlMb10F69LFOssZ6DLYZ nG12TlK0hz3kkB9SzV1W8BPz/ZMdZkAmM2h/I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=w4NYyzY+uivupzX7ah2NOASGpxsjRgix 3AYZOfOxX/Q5RLvAzW9Th/MSELevkK9MTCSQEjDD1hY1eQr01Cq18IsyCyepmvkU eYZSFRdSOON/KPg6Sh+HEXm9xm5MECSqfFsn40huXahcDVi10A1udKtqwememQ/d wJI/kmCPm2Q= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9AF903FD; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:45:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFA96903FC; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:45:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: mr/bisect-in-c-3, was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2020, #03; Mon, 19) References: Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:45:22 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:44:21 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 56FD30F6-13DE-11EB-9C24-D152C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: >> It has been reviewed _quite_ a couple of times over the course of 9 >> iterations, and I think it is ready now. > > Oh, numbers I can count. I wanted to hear "yes, all previously > known issues have been addressed" from those who did read everything > in it and gave their feedback. > > Do you want to give your "reviewed-by" now? Ah, I should have looked again. Yes, these look good (and the sign-off chain ends with your reviewed-by already). Thanks.