From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6A5C38A24 for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 19:33:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02272216FD for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 19:33:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="TLZcS10w" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728227AbgEGTdb (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2020 15:33:31 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:61164 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726320AbgEGTd1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2020 15:33:27 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D24530F9; Thu, 7 May 2020 15:33:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ScE01gMIBGvEur+paYRwcy2jWDY=; b=TLZcS1 0w/sI4KVhv8D/lRhCJ5hj5VCv82nejDbteuhqjNTL2ayD09ZsyaykxD6wlnBL9AG O4c9t9GNeZxAdo9weAJxH04qdT5QCRDsuQeQeGbHp9lFxLItHxJ5fG3hpQlqJbhL uGaoybv4nZwxwhUKhXFDPUruxhkR9eTTLMTyY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=KHIGoVN0KqFt94vtvYsE6/sz8WTQs51j 2aHmFTCOrUqCuVA91q53kdCLTVBTZesLyR0sHA2M4rIXxjUy3KfzTi/iOMp/oQfe JkFzh0m5k/bXO/0N2Pr4XsM2mQFIeP28urH2rfam4ILH2PJ8w7WgwPjJby2HGJ3t LPX9aOzRXrc= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7627F530F8; Thu, 7 May 2020 15:33:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04BEE530F7; Thu, 7 May 2020 15:33:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: =?utf-8?B?xJBvw6BuIFRy4bqnbiBDw7RuZw==?= Danh , Taylor Blau , git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Hostetler , Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] CI: limit GitHub Actions to designated branches References: <20200505164326.GA64077@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20200505182418.GA66702@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20200505210451.GA645290@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20200506004612.GE927@danh.dev> <20200506142500.GA2429@danh.dev> <20200507122549.GB3057274@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20200507185405.GA23736@coredump.intra.peff.net> Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 12:33:24 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20200507185405.GA23736@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu, 7 May 2020 14:54:05 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 9E6A2B7E-9099-11EA-921C-C28CBED8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > In the patch I sent out a few hours ago I just caved and made > refs/heads/ci-config the magic ref, in order to avoid complexity. > > But it also wouldn't be too bad to say "look, you can store this however > you like in refs/heads/ or not at all, but install it into place with > git push HEAD:refs/ci/config". The audience is git.git > developers (and even advanced ones whose workflows involve tweaking > their CI config), so I'd like to think they could figure it out. > > I have a feeling that fewer than 5 people in the world will end up using > this feature either way. ;) Yeah, let's not spend too much time and too many cycles to overengineer it. Thanks.