From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE85C43603 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 22:34:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDDC20866 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 22:34:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="cD2jHoBi" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726834AbfLTWe4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Dec 2019 17:34:56 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:53636 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725965AbfLTWez (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Dec 2019 17:34:55 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3CD4A2313; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 17:34:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=rnOw1eTr7ct+3ZyZ7QP7sn1vXmQ=; b=cD2jHo BiM77z3bbcbovalcdXOXN8B5nLL/ARRHlHlQCLzf1KRa3kZhYfhwfePFoIFa5JPn HDasJD0fVbWlyO2iE5zMGp3fVxaUYH7IpXUsUPH4EclJWLj3+6l7oTV6skPa1qHV lCsdD9WqnGfIZHPZ2JCtOWD/Azgsxe1mNCwnc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=XwRgDQJbxNRItZ161Tb/6rXQJm/a6oJE VA+ndbQxB1ZL5CReF1zKYmgHUdCHN/Pf5rc/vMnb0sJaV+t47UNiQd33oSp2iDOy KolMRr9hTj4jPhI02z5ZgyRuOkgSrsgRKbeWjguKGi/bIEFUMI46Kc9nBlStBJpN VKwooekPDxI= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAFF7A2312; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 17:34:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EBA3CA2311; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 17:34:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Elijah Newren Cc: Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget , Git Mailing List , Johannes Schindelin , Pavel Roskin Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] am: pay attention to user-defined context size References: Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 14:34:47 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Elijah Newren's message of "Fri, 20 Dec 2019 14:22:55 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: EF861632-2378-11EA-81AD-8D86F504CC47-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Elijah Newren writes: > diff.context should NOT affect plumbing. So if it's not plumbing by > that test, and it's not *UI* as per what you say, what exactly is it? I actually was saying that diff.context is UI thing, and should make no effect on how "am" interprets its input. Which the codepath in "am" are you trying to affect? "am" is mainly a consumer of "diff" output, and not a producer, so ...